Literature DB >> 21110208

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.

Chao Ma1, Shaoling Wu, Lingjun Xiao, Yunlian Xue.   

Abstract

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most widely used questionnaires that assess disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). Responsiveness is both an important psychometric property of an instrument and a key issue for clinicians when choosing suitable outcome measures. The objective of this study was to examine the responsiveness of the Chinese version of the ODI (ODI-Chinese) for subjects with chronic LBP following a physical therapy program. In total, 76 patients with chronic LBP completed the ODI-Chinese, a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, and the Chinese version of Short Form-36 (SF-36) before and after treatment. All patients also completed a global perception of change Likert scale in condition after the program. The scale was collapsed to produce a dichotomous variable outcome, improved or non-improved. The responsiveness of the instruments was determined using the standardized response means (SRM) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). After treatment, 56 patients considered themselves to be improved. The SRM of the ODI-Chinese was -1.2 in the improved group and -0.4 in the non-improved group. The area of the ROC curve for the ODI-Chinese was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.89). Therefore, the Chinese version of the ODI is both responsive and appropriate for use in chronic LBP patients after conservative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110208      PMCID: PMC3048234          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Risk factors for work-related low back pain in the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  K Jin; G S Sorock; T Courtney; Y Liang; Z Yao; S Matz; L Ge
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions.

Authors:  Hideki Hashimoto; Masahi Komagata; Osamu Nakai; Masutaro Morishita; Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Shigeo Sano; Yutaka Nohara; Yukikazu Okajima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

7.  Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.

Authors:  Thomas L Walsh; Brett Hanscom; Jon D Lurie; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Huiren Tao; Zhuojing Luo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Coelho; Fabiano B Siqueira; Paulo H Ferreira; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b.

Authors:  Karlen K P Law; P L Lee; W W Kwan; K C Mak; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Outcome measurement in patients with low back pain undergoing epidural steroid injection.

Authors:  Tülay Erçalık; Kardelen Gencer Atalay; Canan Şanal Toprak; Osman Hakan Gündüz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-18

3.  Determination of minimally clinically important differences for JOABPEQ measure after discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

4.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

5.  Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mulugeta Bayisa Chala; Catherine Donnelly; Yemataw Wondie; Setareh Ghahari; Jordan Miller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Does Smoking Affect Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Decompression?

Authors:  Dhruv K C Goyal; Srikanth N Divi; Daniel R Bowles; Victor E Mujica; I David Kaye; Mark F Kurd; Barrett I Woods; Kris E Radcliff; Jeffrey A Rihn; D Greg Anderson; Alan S Hilibrand; Christopher K Kepler; Alexander R Vaccaro; Gregory D Schroeder
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-29

7.  Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Kandel Binaya; Thapa Kajal; Acharya S Ranjeeta; Nepal Govinda
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-08-09

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Hamad S Al Amer; Fahad Alanazi; Mohamed ELdesoky; Ayman Honin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.