Literature DB >> 33494728

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia.

Mulugeta Bayisa Chala1,2, Catherine Donnelly3, Yemataw Wondie4, Setareh Ghahari3, Jordan Miller3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a valid and reliable instrument that evaluates pain self-efficacy beliefs in people with pain conditions. However, it has not been validated and used in Ethiopia. We conducted this study to translate, adapt, and test the psychometric properties of the PSEQ in the Amharic language and Ethiopian context for its use with people experiencing low back pain (LBP).
METHODS: The PSEQ was translated into Amharic and then back-translated into English. An expert review committee created a final Amharic version of the tool (PSEQ-Am), followed by pilot testing and cognitive debriefing with a sample of 20 people with LBP. The psychometric properties of the final version of PSEQ-Am were assessed in a sample of 240 people with LBP recruited from three rehabilitation centers in Ethiopia. Cronbach's alpha and Intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to describe the reliability and internal consistency of the tool. The SF-36-Am bodily pain subscale was used to assess convergent validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were performed to determine the dimensionality of the instrument.
RESULTS: PSEQ-Am demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). As hypothesized, the tool demonstrated a significant moderate correlation with the Bodily Pain subscale of the SF-36-Am (Rho = 0.51, p < 0.01). EFA analysis shows that the Amharic version of PSEQ is a dominant one factor and secondary two factor structure.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that PSEQ-Am is a reliable and valid tool that can be used in both clinical practice and research in the Ethiopian low back pain population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-cultural adaptation; Cross-cultural translation; Ethiopia; Low back pain; Reliability; Self-efficacy; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33494728      PMCID: PMC7836442          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03985-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  55 in total

1.  Health related quality of life (SF-36) survey in Butajira, rural Ethiopia: normative data and evaluation of reliability and validity.

Authors:  Derege Kebede; Atalay Alem; Teshome Shibre; Alemayehu Negash; Negussie Deyassa; Teferra Beyero
Journal:  Ethiop Med J       Date:  2004-10

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties.

Authors:  Holger Osthus; Reinhard Cziske; Eckard Jacobi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation into Italian and Assessment of Its Measurement Properties.

Authors:  Alessandro Chiarotto; Carla Vanti; Raymond W Ostelo; Silvano Ferrari; Giuseppe Tedesco; Barbara Rocca; Paolo Pillastrini; Marco Monticone
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): how should I interpret reports of measurement properties? A practical guide for clinicians and researchers who are not biostatisticians.

Authors:  Megan Davidson; Jennifer Keating
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Alessandro Chiarotto; Carla Vanti; Christine Cedraschi; Silvano Ferrari; Fernanda de Lima E Sà Resende; Raymond W Ostelo; Paolo Pillastrini
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 9.  Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science.

Authors:  Francis J Keefe; Meredith E Rumble; Cindy D Scipio; Louis A Giordano; LisaCaitlin M Perri
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.

Authors:  Sepideh S Farivar; William E Cunningham; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Dubé; Pierre Langevin; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-12-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.