Literature DB >> 17450079

Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations.

Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa1, Chris G Maher, Jane Latimer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the available cross-cultural adaptations of low back pain (LBP) self-report outcome measures and the psychometric testing that has occurred for each adaptation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Self-report measures are commonly used in clinical practice and in research studies. Most existing questionnaires were developed in English, and it is not clear how many have been adapted to other languages.
METHODS: Two different searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS were performed. The first search identified questionnaires specifically designed for patients with LBP. The second search combined the name of the questionnaire with 35 different languages in order to locate cross-cultural adaptations of the questionnaire. Data on the psychometric testing of the translated questionnaires were extracted.
RESULTS: Forty questionnaires were identified, only 15 of which had been adapted to a new language. Only 19 of the 35 different languages we searched for were represented in the search results. From 1400 possible adaptations, only 61 have been completed. Psychometric testing of the adapted questionnaires was quite variable and in general suboptimal with testing usually restricted to an assessment of reliability and construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for further cross-cultural adaptation of LBP self-report measures and for greater attention to the quality of psychometric evaluation of adapted questionnaires. Without appropriately adapted measures, the clinical management of LBP patients who do not speak English is potentially compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17450079     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261024.27926.0f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review.

Authors:  Indiara Soares Oliveira; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Chao Ma; Shaoling Wu; Lingjun Xiao; Yunlian Xue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Ingrid Riphagen; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Stéphane Genevay; Christine Cedraschi; Marc Marty; Sylvie Rozenberg; Pierre De Goumoëns; Antonio Faundez; Federico Balagué; François Porchet; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.

Authors:  Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Fernanda Ferreira Fuhro; Ana Carolina Tacollini Manzoni; Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: validity and reliability.

Authors:  Letícia Bojikian Calixtre; Carlos Luques Fonseca; Bruno Leonardo da Silva Gruninger; Danilo Harudy Kamonseki
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  What comprises a good outcome in spinal surgery? A preliminary survey among spine surgeons of the SSE and European spine patients.

Authors:  M Haefeli; A Elfering; M Aebi; B J C Freeman; P Fritzell; J Guimaraes Consciencia; C Lamartina; M Mayer; T Lund; N Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Factor analysis of the SRS-22 outcome assessment instrument in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Elfering; J Bago; F Pellise; A Vila-Casademunt; S Richner-Wunderlin; M Domingo-Sàbat; I Obeid; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F S Pérez-Grueso; C R Baldus; L Y Carreon; K H Bridwell; S D Glassman; F Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale.

Authors:  Tamás Valasek; Peter Paul Varga; Zsolt Szövérfi; Michelle Kümin; Jeremy Fairbank; Aron Lazary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.