Literature DB >> 18512083

Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.

Rodrigo A Coelho1, Fabiano B Siqueira, Paulo H Ferreira, Manuela L Ferreira.   

Abstract

When quality of life questionnaires are used as measures of treatment outcomes, it is essential to know how well these can respond to clinical changes. The objective of this study is to examine the responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-Brazil) in subjects with chronic low back pain submitted to a physical therapy program. Thirty subjects with chronic low back pain completed the ODI-Brazil questionnaire, along with an 11-point pain visual analogue scale (Pain VAS), and the Brazilian-Portuguese version of Roland-Morris disability questionnaire before and after the program. All patients also completed a global perception of change Likert scale in condition after the program. This scale was collapsed to produce a dichotomous variable outcome: improved and non-improved. Responsiveness was determined using effect size statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), with best cut-point analysis. The best change score cut-off was identified when equally balanced sensitivity and specificity was found, as an expression of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). After treatment, 19 patients considered themselves improved. Both the effect size (0.37) and the area under the ROC curve (0.73) for ODI-Brazil score in relation to global outcome after program indicated that the ODI-Brazil showed responsiveness. The ROC curve for ODI-Brazil was distributed at the upper corners of the diagonal line, indicating that the questionnaire presents discriminative ability. The best cut-off point for ODI-Brazil was approximately 4.45 points (63.2% sensitivity, 81.8% specificity). The Brazilian-Portuguese version of ODI has comparable responsiveness to other commonly used functional status measures and is appropriate for use in chronic low back pain patients receiving conservative care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18512083      PMCID: PMC2518761          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  M Roland; J Fairbank
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments.

Authors:  M E Suarez-Almazor; C Kendall; J A Johnson; K Skeith; D Vincent
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

Authors:  Megan Davidson; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-01

7.  Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  P Rantanen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Responsiveness of the Bournemouth and Oswestry questionnaires: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Perillo; Ronald Bulbulian
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 9.  Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.

Authors:  C Bombardier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire--Brazil Roland-Morris.

Authors:  L Nusbaum; J Natour; M B Ferraz; J Goldenberg
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.590

View more
  13 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Chao Ma; Shaoling Wu; Lingjun Xiao; Yunlian Xue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A Systematic Review of Head-to-Head Comparison Studies of the Roland-Morris and Oswestry Measures' Abilities to Assess Change.

Authors:  Anastasia N L Newman; Paul W Stratford; Lori Letts; Gregory Spadoni
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Katsushi Takeshita; Nobuhiro Hara; Ko Matsudaira; So Kato; Kazuhiro Masuda; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Paola Baiardi; Carla Vanti; Silvano Ferrari; Paolo Pillastrini; Raffaele Mugnai; Calogero Foti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical and Radiological Results After Minimally Invasive Transpsoas Lateral Access Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.

Authors:  Thiago Pereira Coutinho; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Raphael Martus Marcon; Ivan Dias da Rocha; Allan Hiroshi Ono; Guilherme Pereira Correa Meyer; Tarcísio Eloy de Pessoa Barros Filho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-07-26

6.  A Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Target Value to Distinguish between Functional and Dysfunctional States in People with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b.

Authors:  Karlen K P Law; P L Lee; W W Kwan; K C Mak; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of aquatic and land physical therapy on musculoskeletal dysfunction of sickle cell disease patients.

Authors:  Camila Tatiana Zanoni; Fábio Galvão; Alberto Cliquet Junior; Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2014-11-21

9.  Differences in pain perception, health-related quality of life, disability, mood, and sleep between Brazilian and Spanish people with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Daiana P Rodrigues-De-Souza; César Fernández-De-Las-Peñas; Francisco J Martín-Vallejo; Juan F Blanco-Blanco; Lourdes Moro-Gutiérrez; Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Carol Fawkes; Jonathan Foss; Martin Underwood; Dawn Carnes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.