Literature DB >> 21110080

Results from the survey for preservation of adolescent reproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer.

Tobias S Köhler1, Laxmi A Kondapalli, Amul Shah, Sarah Chan, Teresa K Woodruff, Robert E Brannigan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diminished reproductive capacity is a devastating consequence of life-sparing therapies for childhood malignancy. In 2006, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published fertility preservation recommendations (ASCOR) emphasizing the importance of early discussion and intervention for fertility preservation strategies. Using the Survey for Preservation of Adolescent REproduction (SPARE), we sought to determine fertility preservation attitudes and practice patterns post-ASCOR from pediatric oncology specialists nationwide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SPARE survey consists of 22 questions assessing pediatric oncology specialists' attitudes and practice patterns toward fertility preservation. Broad perspectives on fertility preservation, including a willingness to discuss fertility, knowledge of current fertility preservation methods and awareness of ASCOR, were assessed.
RESULTS: The majority of respondents acknowledged that fertility threats are a major concern for them and agreed that all pubertal cancer patients should be offered a fertility consultation, but only 46% reported they refer male pubertal cancer patients to a fertility specialist prior to cancer treatment >50% of the time, and only 12% reported they refer female pubertal cancer patients to a fertility specialist prior to cancer treatment > 50% of the time. While 44% of respondents were familiar with the 2006 ASCOR, only 39% of those utilized them to guide decision-making in greater than half of their patients.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates pediatric oncologists' motivation to preserve fertility in pediatric cancer patients; however, barriers to both gamete cryopreservation and referral to fertility specialists persist. Female pubertal patients are referred to fertility preservation specialists with much less frequency than are male pubertal patients, highlighting a disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110080      PMCID: PMC3082660          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9504-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  30 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of follicle destruction in chemical-induced ovarian toxicity.

Authors:  P B Hoyer; I G Sipes
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  A survey of oncologists regarding sperm cryopreservation and assisted reproductive techniques for male cancer patients.

Authors:  D M Zapzalka; J B Redmon; J L Pryor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Genetic and teratogenic effects of cancer treatments on gametes and embryos.

Authors:  J Arnon; D Meirow; H Lewis-Roness; A Ornoy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Kimberly Brey; Alan Lichtin; Larry I Lipshultz; Sima Jeha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Oncologists' attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Kimberly Brey; Alan Lichtin; Larry I Lipshultz; Sima Jeha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Medical hope, legal pitfalls: potential legal issues in the emerging field of oncofertility.

Authors:  Gregory Dolin; Dorothy E Roberts; Lina M Rodriguez; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

Review 7.  The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction.

Authors:  D Meirow; D Nugent
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 8.  Effect of irradiation treatment on gonadal function in men treated for germ cell cancer.

Authors:  S M Shalet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Is semen cryopreservation helpful in testicular cancer?

Authors:  R B Bracken; K D Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Feasibility of semen cryopreservation in patients with malignant disease.

Authors:  W G Sanger; J O Armitage; M A Schmidt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980 Aug 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  54 in total

1.  Fertility preservation practices among Ontario oncologists.

Authors:  Samantha Yee; Esme Fuller-Thomson; Angela Lau; Ellen M Greenblatt
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Childhood to adult transition and long-term follow-up after blood and marrow transplantation.

Authors:  M C Cupit; C Duncan; B N Savani; S K Hashmi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Fertility Preservation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Adolescents', Parents', and Providers' Perspectives, Experiences, and Preferences.

Authors:  Julia F Taylor; Mary A Ott
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Do Patient Characteristics Decide if Young Adult Cancer Patients Undergo Fertility Preservation?

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 5.  Anticancer treatments and female fertility: clinical concerns and role of oncologists in oncofertility practice.

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 6.  Female reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: guidelines for the assessment and management of female reproductive complications.

Authors:  Monika L Metzger; Lillian R Meacham; Briana Patterson; Jacqueline S Casillas; Louis S Constine; Nobuko Hijiya; Lisa B Kenney; Marcia Leonard; Barbara A Lockart; Wendy Likes; Daniel M Green
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  A Review of the Oncology Patient's Challenges for Utilizing Fertility Preservation Services.

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 8.  Reproductive health in the adolescent and young adult cancer patient: an innovative training program for oncology nurses.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Nicole M Hutchins; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Oncofertility program implementation increases access to fertility preservation options and assisted reproductive procedures for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Natalia C Llarena; Samantha L Estevez; Molly B Moravek; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Future Directions in Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation: A Report from the 2011 Oncofertility Consortium Conference.

Authors:  Kate E Waimey; Francesca E Duncan; H Irene Su; Kristin Smith; Harlan Wallach; Kemi Jona; Christos Coutifaris; Clarisa R Gracia; Lonnie D Shea; Robert E Brannigan; R Jeffrey Chang; Mary B Zelinski; Richard L Stouffer; Robert L Taylor; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.