Literature DB >> 18356438

Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening: concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT.

Ming-Ting Wu1, Pinchen Yang, Yi-Luan Huang, Jian-Shyong Chen, Chiung-Chen Chuo, Chinson Yeh, Ruey-Sheng Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is frequently detected on low-dose ungated MDCT performed for lung cancer screening. We aimed to determine the concordance of CAC scores on low-dose ungated and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 513 patients consecutively registered for health screening and undergoing both low-dose ungated (120 kVp, 20 mAs) and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT (120 kVp, 150 mAs, retrospective ECG gating). The first 30 cases were used for protocol optimization and a training session. Agatston score on regular-dose ECG-gated and low-dose ungated MDCT in the other 483 cases (320 men; mean age, 62.2 +/- 13.2 [SD] years) was calculated by two observers in a blinded manner. Interobserver and intertechnique scoring variability and concordance were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean of interobserver scoring variability for regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT was 3.6% and for low-dose ungated MDCT was 9.6%. Regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT depicted CAC in 221 (46%) of the subjects. With low-dose ungated MDCT, observers 1 and 2, respectively, had five and seven false-positive and five and four false-negative predictions. All the miscategorized scores were 12 or less. The negative predictive values of CAC on low-dose ungated MDCT were 98% and 99% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For patients with CAC, the mean intertechnique scoring variability was 40-43%. For all 483 subjects, the intertechnique concordance of the four major score ranks (0, 1-100, 101-400, > 400) was high (kappa = 0.89 for the two observers).
CONCLUSION: Low-dose ungated MDCT with an optimized protocol is reliable for prediction of the presence of CAC and categorization of the four major Agatston score ranks. This technique may be useful for coronary artery disease risk stratification of persons undergoing low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18356438     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  44 in total

1.  Detection of coronary calcium during standard chest computed tomography correlates with multi-detector computed tomography coronary artery calcium score.

Authors:  Jacobo Kirsch; Ivan Buitrago; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; Tianming Gao; Craig R Asher; Gian M Novaro
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Coronary calcium screening with dual-source CT: reliability of ungated, high-pitch chest CT in comparison with dedicated calcium-scoring CT.

Authors:  Antoine Hutt; Alain Duhamel; Valérie Deken; Jean-Baptiste Faivre; Francesco Molinari; Jacques Remy; Martine Remy-Jardin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Automated quantitative 3D analysis of aorta size, morphology, and mural calcification distributions.

Authors:  Sila Kurugol; Carolyn E Come; Alejandro A Diaz; James C Ross; Greg L Kinney; Jennifer L Black-Shinn; John E Hokanson; Matthew J Budoff; George R Washko; Raul San Jose Estepar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Coronary calcium scoring of CT attenuation correction scans: Automatic, manual, or visual?

Authors:  Shifali Dumeer; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Coronary artery calcium score on low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Teresa Arcadi; Erica Maffei; Nicola Sverzellati; Cesare Mantini; Andrea I Guaricci; Carlo Tedeschi; Chiara Martini; Ludovico La Grutta; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

6.  Association of Coronary Artery Calcification and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Comparison of Three Scoring Methods.

Authors:  Caroline Chiles; Fenghai Duan; Gregory W Gladish; James G Ravenel; Scott G Baginski; Bradley S Snyder; Sarah DeMello; Stephanie S Desjardins; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Coronary artery calcification in clinical practice: what we have learned and why should it routinely be reported on chest CT?

Authors:  Joseph Shemesh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

8.  Reliability analysis of visual ranking of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT of the thorax for lung cancer screening: comparison with ECG-gated calcium scoring CT.

Authors:  Yoon Kyung Kim; Yon Mi Sung; So Hyun Cho; Young Nam Park; Hye-Young Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  National trends among radiologists in reporting coronary artery calcium in non-gated chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacobo Kirsch; Felipe Martinez; David Lopez; Gian M Novaro; Craig R Asher
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Relationship of Coronary Calcium on Standard Chest CT Scans With Mortality.

Authors:  Jan M Hughes-Austin; Arturo Dominguez; Matthew A Allison; Christina L Wassel; Dena E Rifkin; Cindy G Morgan; Michael R Daniels; Umaira Ikram; Jessica B Knox; C Michael Wright; Michael H Criqui; Joachim H Ix
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.