Literature DB >> 21107729

Comparison of DGGE and immunohistochemistry in the detection of TP53 variants in a Brazilian sample of sporadic breast tumors.

Vitor Rezende da Costa Aguiar1, Melissa de Freitas Cordeiro-Silva, Alex Assis de Carvalho, Iúri Drumond Louro.   

Abstract

The presence of TP53 gene mutations in breast cancer has been associated with worse prognosis. These mutations interfere with the ability of the p53 protein, a transcription factor, to regulate the expression of target genes. Unlike the wild-type protein, which is rapidly degraded in cells, mutated forms have increased half-life and accumulate in tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely used in Brazil in the determination of breast cancer patients' prognosis. However, this technique is not able to detect many altered forms of the p53 protein (false-negative results) and readily detects the accumulation of wild-type p53 (false-positive results) that is associated with non-tumoral processes. For these reasons, we have set out to compare the efficiency of IHC with a molecular technique that detects gene variations at the DNA level in the evaluation of Brazilian patients with sporadic breast cancer. We have used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to study the TP53 status in 45 tumors, finding 26 allelic variants, most of them located in exon 4. Comparing the two techniques, IHC showed a false-negative rate of 64% and a false-positive rate of 50%. These results confirm the inability of IHC to correctly detect TP53 status, reason because it should not be routinely used to establish prognosis of breast cancer patients in Brazilian Pathology Laboratories. We recommend the utilization of a screening method, such as DGGE, followed by sequencing of altered exonic fragments to correctly detect TP53 gene variants and establish the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107729     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-010-0440-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  15 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in p53 research: an interdisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  M Olivier; A Petitjean; V Marcel; A Pétré; M Mounawar; A Plymoth; C C de Fromentel; P Hainaut
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 2.  TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes.

Authors:  A Petitjean; M I W Achatz; A L Borresen-Dale; P Hainaut; M Olivier
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  T Aas; A L Børresen; S Geisler; B Smith-Sørensen; H Johnsen; J E Varhaug; L A Akslen; P E Lønning
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  p53 missense mutations in microdissected high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  S J Done; S Eskandarian; S Bull; M Redston; I L Andrulis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  TP53 and breast cancer.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  S Geisler; P E Lønning; T Aas; H Johnsen; O Fluge; D F Haugen; J R Lillehaug; L A Akslen; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  TP53 gene mutations predict the response to neoadjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Geisler; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Hilde Johnsen; Turid Aas; Jürgen Geisler; Lars Andreas Akslen; Gun Anker; Per Eystein Lønning
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Magali Olivier; Anita Langerød; Patrizia Carrieri; Jonas Bergh; Sigrid Klaar; Jorunn Eyfjord; Charles Theillet; Carmen Rodriguez; Rosette Lidereau; Ivan Bièche; Jennifer Varley; Yves Bignon; Nancy Uhrhammer; Robert Winqvist; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Dieter Niederacher; Shunsuke Kato; Chikashi Ishioka; Pierre Hainaut; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  The p53 gene in breast cancer: prognostic value of complementary DNA sequencing versus immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  S Sjögren; M Inganäs; T Norberg; A Lindgren; H Nordgren; L Holmberg; J Bergh
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of TP53 mutations in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J Alsner; M Yilmaz; P Guldberg; L L Hansen; J Overgaard
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.