Literature DB >> 16489069

The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer.

Magali Olivier1, Anita Langerød, Patrizia Carrieri, Jonas Bergh, Sigrid Klaar, Jorunn Eyfjord, Charles Theillet, Carmen Rodriguez, Rosette Lidereau, Ivan Bièche, Jennifer Varley, Yves Bignon, Nancy Uhrhammer, Robert Winqvist, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Dieter Niederacher, Shunsuke Kato, Chikashi Ishioka, Pierre Hainaut, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale.   

Abstract

To investigate the clinical value of somatic TP53 mutations in breast cancer, we assembled clinical and molecular data on 1,794 women with primary breast cancer with long-term follow-up and whose tumor has been screened for mutation in exons 5 to 8 of TP53 by gene sequencing. TP53 mutations were more frequent in tumors of ductal and medullar types, aggressive phenotype (high grade, large size, node positive cases, and low hormone receptor content) and in women <60 years old. TP53 mutations within exons 5 to 8 conferred an elevated risk of breast cancer-specific death of 2.27 (relative risk >10 years; P < 0.0001) compared with patients with no such mutation. The prognostic value of TP53 mutation was independent of tumor size, node status, and hormone receptor content, confirming and reconciling previous findings in smaller series. Moreover, an interaction between TP53 mutation and progesterone receptor (PR) status was revealed, TP53 mutation combined with the absence of progesterone receptor being associated with the worst prognosis. Whereas previous studies have emphasized the fact that missense mutations in the DNA-binding motifs have a worse prognosis than missense mutations outside these motifs, we show that non-missense mutations have prognostic value similar to missense mutations in DNA-binding motifs. Nonetheless, specific missense mutants (codon 179 and R248W) seem to be associated with an even worse prognosis. These results, obtained on the largest series analyzed thus far, show that TP53 mutations identified by gene sequencing have an independent prognostic value in breast cancer and could have potential uses in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489069     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  208 in total

1.  MET-dependent cancer invasion may be preprogrammed by early alterations of p53-regulated feedforward loop and triggered by stromal cell-derived HGF.

Authors:  Chang-Il Hwang; Jinhyang Choi; Zongxiang Zhou; Andrea Flesken-Nikitin; Alexander Tarakhovsky; Alexander Yu Nikitin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Alterations in p53, BRCA1, ATM, PIK3CA, and HER2 genes and their effect in modifying clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of Bulgarian patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefan S Bozhanov; Svetla G Angelova; Maria E Krasteva; Tsanko L Markov; Svetlana L Christova; Ivan G Gavrilov; Elena I Georgieva
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Links between mutant p53 and genomic instability.

Authors:  Walter Hanel; Ute M Moll
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Random mutations, selected mutations: A PIN opens the door to new genetic landscapes.

Authors:  Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Somatic sequence alterations in twenty-one genes selected by expression profile analysis of breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Stephen J Chanock; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Victor Llaca; Anita Langerød; Shafaq Presswalla; Rolf Kaaresen; Robert L Strausberg; Daniela S Gerhard; Vessela Kristensen; Charles M Perou; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Prevalence of TP53 germ line mutations in young Pakistani breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Muhammad U Rashid; Sidra Gull; Kashif Asghar; Noor Muhammad; Asim Amin; Ute Hamann
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  Rates of TP53 Mutation are Significantly Elevated in African American Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Elke J A H van Beek; Jonathan M Hernandez; Debra A Goldman; Jeremy L Davis; Kaitlin McLaughlin; R Taylor Ripley; Teresa S Kim; Laura H Tang; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Jian Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Yelena Y Janjigian; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  The expanding universe of p53 targets.

Authors:  Daniel Menendez; Alberto Inga; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  p53: a molecular marker for the detection of cancer.

Authors:  Mark T Boyd; Nikolina Vlatkovic
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.