Literature DB >> 11051239

Heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of TP53 mutations in breast cancer patients.

J Alsner1, M Yilmaz, P Guldberg, L L Hansen, J Overgaard.   

Abstract

TP53 mutation is a strong independent marker for survival in breast cancer with some heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of various types of mutations. Based on 315 patients with breast carcinoma, we suggest a new model for the differentiation of TP53 mutations. Although TP53 mutation in general was associated with aggressive tumor/patient characteristics, missense mutations outside any conserved or structural domain did not affect the clinical outcome (risk of disseminated disease and death). In contrast, patients with missense mutations affecting amino acids directly involved in DNA or zinc binding displayed a very aggressive clinical phenotype. Null mutations (including missense mutations disrupting the tetramerization domain) and the remaining missense mutations displayed an intermediate aggressive clinical phenotype. When patients with primary early breast cancer were divided into three groups (wild-type together with missense mutations outside structural/conserved domains, null mutations and missense mutations with intermediate clinical phenotype, and very aggressive missense mutations), disease-specific survival rates were 89%, 58%, and 35% (5-year actuarial values, P < 0.0001), respectively. In a Cox proportional hazards analysis, separation of TP53 mutations according to these criteria eliminated the prognostic importance of all investigated classical factors except nodal status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11051239      PMCID: PMC3300808          DOI: 10.1186/bcr109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


Full text

TP53 mutation is a strong independent marker for survival in breast cancer with some heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of various types of mutations. Based on 315 patients with breast carcinoma, we suggest a new model for the differentiation of TP53 mutations. Although TP53 mutation in general was associated with aggressive tumour/patient characteristics, missense mutations outside any conserved or structural domain did not affect the clinical outcome (risk of disseminated disease and death). In contrast, patients with missense mutations affecting amino acids directly involved in DNA-or zinc-binding displayed a very aggressive clinical phenotype. Null mutations (including missense mutations disrupting the tetramerization domain) and the remaining missense mutations displayed an intermediate aggressive clinical phenotype. When patients were divided into 3 groups, (i) wild-type together with the missense mutations outside structural/conserved domains, (ii) null mutations and the missense with intermediate clinical phenotype, and (iii) the very aggressive missense mutations, disease-specific survival rates were 89%, 58%, and 35% (5-year actuarial values, P < 0.0001), respectively. In a Cox proportional hazards analysis, separation of TP53 mutations according to these criteria eliminated the prognostic importance of all investigated classical factors except nodal status.
  28 in total

1.  Increased formation of reactive oxygen species during tumor growth: Ex vivo low-temperature EPR and in vivo bioluminescence analyses.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Jing Pan; Radoslaw Podsiadly; Jacek Zielonka; Alexander M Garces; Luiz Gabriel Dias Duarte Machado; Brian Bennett; Donna McAllister; Michael B Dwinell; Ming You; Balaraman Kalyanaraman
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Assessing the value of CAN-gene mutations using MALDI-TOF MS.

Authors:  Corina Kohler; Björn Tavelin; Alex Xiu-Cheng Fan; Ramin Radpour; Zeinab Barekati; Fabio Levi; Xiao Yan Zhong; Per Lenner; Paolo Toniolo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Statistical kinematics of axillary nodal metastases in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Wayne S Kendal
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 4.  Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dana Carmen Zaha
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Comparison of DGGE and immunohistochemistry in the detection of TP53 variants in a Brazilian sample of sporadic breast tumors.

Authors:  Vitor Rezende da Costa Aguiar; Melissa de Freitas Cordeiro-Silva; Alex Assis de Carvalho; Iúri Drumond Louro
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

7.  Factors Associated with (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in T1 and T2 Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  So Jung Kim; Seong-Jang Kim; In Joo Kim; Kyoungjune Pak; Bum Soo Kim; Seunghyeon Shin
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 8.  Tumor-Derived Cell Lines as Molecular Models of Cancer Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Andrew Goodspeed; Laura M Heiser; Joe W Gray; James C Costello
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 9.  Biomarkers in triple negative breast cancer: A review.

Authors:  Budhi S Yadav; Priyanka Chanana; Swaty Jhamb
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 10.  Mutant p53 on the Path to Metastasis.

Authors:  Qiaosi Tang; Zhenyi Su; Wei Gu; Anil K Rustgi
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.