Literature DB >> 11289122

Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer.

S Geisler1, P E Lønning, T Aas, H Johnsen, O Fluge, D F Haugen, J R Lillehaug, L A Akslen, A L Børresen-Dale.   

Abstract

TP53 status [mutations, immunostaining, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH)], expression of c-erbB-2, bcl-2, and histological grading were correlated to the response to doxorubicin monotherapy (14 mg/m2) administered weekly to 90 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Mutations in the TP53 gene, in particular those affecting or disrupting the loop domains L2 or L3 of the p53 protein, were associated with lack of response to chemotherapy (P = 0.063 for all mutations and P = 0.008 for mutations affecting L2/L3, respectively). Similarly, expression of c-erbB-2 (P = 0.041), a high histological grade (P = 0.023), and lack of expression of bcl-2 (P = 0.018) all predicted chemoresistance. No statistically significant association between either p53 immunostaining or TP53 LOH and response to therapy was recorded, despite the finding that both were associated with TP53 mutation status (p53 immunostaining, P < 0.001; LOH, P = 0.021). Lack of immunostaining for p53 despite mutation of the TP53 gene was particularly seen in tumors harboring nonsense mutations or deletions/splices (7 of 10 negative for staining compared with 4 of 16 with missense mutations). TP53 mutations (total/affecting L2/L3 domains) were associated with expression of c-erbB-2 (P < 0.001 for both), high histological grade (P = 0.001 and P = 0.025), and bcl-2 negativity (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002). TP53 mutations, histological grade, and expression of bcl-2 (but not LOH or c-erbB-2 expression) all predicted for relapse-free as well as breast cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis (Ps between <0.0001 and 0.0155), but only tumor grade was found to be predictive in multivariate analysis (P = 0.01 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that certain TP53 mutations predict for resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. However, the observation that the majority of patients with TP53 mutations affecting or disrupting the L2/L3 domains with LOH in addition (n = 12) obtained a partial response (n = 4) or stabilization of disease (n = 5) during chemotherapy suggests redundant mechanisms to compensate for loss of p53 function. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that other defects may act in concert with loss of p53 function, causing resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11289122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  99 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Sulforaphane in Cancer Chemoprevention: The Role of Epigenetic Regulation and HDAC Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Renewable standard reference material for the detection of TP53 mutations.

Authors:  Catherine D O'Connell; Lois A Tully; Joseph M Devaney; Michael A Marino; John P Jakupciak; Donald H Atha
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sánchez; Armando Gamboa-Dominguez; Norma Uribe; Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Diana Flores-Estrada; Myrna Candelaria; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Quantitative analysis of chromosomal CGH in human breast tumors associates copy number abnormalities with p53 status and patient survival.

Authors:  A N Jain; K Chin; A L Børresen-Dale; B K Erikstein; P Eynstein Lonning; R Kaaresen; J W Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Clinical efficacy of administering oxaliplatin combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yang Xiao; Wei Wei; Jian-Xiong Guo; Yang-Chen Liu; Xiao-Hong Huang; Rong-Xia Zhang; Yi-Jia Wu; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Vera R Schelfhout; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Kristof K Daems; Rudolphe F Serreyn; Marleen M Praet; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Strength and weakness of phase I to IV trials, with an emphasis on translational aspects.

Authors:  Per Eystein Lønning
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.