Literature DB >> 21104334

A systematic approach to engineering ethics education.

Jessica Li1, Shengli Fu.   

Abstract

Engineering ethics education is a complex field characterized by dynamic topics and diverse students, which results in significant challenges for engineering ethics educators. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to determine what to teach and how to teach in an ethics curriculum. This is a topic that has not been adequately addressed in the engineering ethics literature. This systematic approach provides a method to: (1) develop a context-specific engineering ethics curriculum using the Delphi technique, a process-driven research method; and (2) identify appropriate delivery strategies and instructional strategies using an instructional design model. This approach considers the context-specific needs of different engineering disciplines in ethics education and leverages the collaboration of engineering professors, practicing engineers, engineering graduate students, ethics scholars, and instructional design experts. The proposed approach is most suitable for a department, a discipline/field or a professional society. The approach helps to enhance learning outcomes and to facilitate ethics education curriculum development as part of the regular engineering curriculum.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104334     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  10 in total

1.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

Authors:  J Haidt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: an ABET 2000 challenge.

Authors:  José A Cruz; William J Frey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  "Mind the gaps": an empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Robert E McGinn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Moral pedagogy and practical ethics.

Authors:  Chuclk Huff; William Frey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.

Authors:  Joseph R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics.

Authors:  Glenn C Graber; Christopher D Pionke
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Engineering ethics, individuals, and organizations.

Authors:  Michael Davis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Engineering the just war: examination of an approach to teaching engineering ethics.

Authors:  David R Haws
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering.

Authors:  Vykinta Kligyte; Richard T Marcy; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Elaine S Godfrey; Michael D Mumford; Dean F Hougen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 10.  Making a case for training in ethnic and cultural diversity in increasing treatment efficacy.

Authors:  B A Yutrzenka
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-04
  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom.

Authors:  Olivia Walling
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering.

Authors:  Jonathan Beever; Andrew O Brightman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Realism and Impartiality: Making Sustainability Effective in Decision-Making.

Authors:  Miquel Bastons; Jaume Armengou
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Engineers and Active Responsibility.

Authors:  Udo Pesch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.

Authors:  William T Lynch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke; Zach Piso; Kyle Whyte; Sean Valles
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.

Authors:  Diana Adela Martin; Eddie Conlon; Brian Bowe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  "In Our Own Little World": Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Lim; Brittany D Hunt; Nickcoy Findlater; Peter T Tkacik; Jerry L Dahlberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Zachary Piso; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.