Literature DB >> 18074243

Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering.

Vykinta Kligyte1, Richard T Marcy, Ethan P Waples, Sydney T Sevier, Elaine S Godfrey, Michael D Mumford, Dean F Hougen.   

Abstract

Integrity is a critical determinant of the effectiveness of research organizations in terms of producing high quality research and educating the new generation of scientists. A number of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training programs have been developed to address this growing organizational concern. However, in spite of a significant body of research in ethics training, it is still unknown which approach has the highest potential to enhance researchers' integrity. One of the approaches showing some promise in improving researchers' integrity has focused on the development of ethical decision-making skills. The current effort proposes a novel curriculum that focuses on broad metacognitive reasoning strategies researchers use when making sense of day-to-day social and professional practices that have ethical implications for the physical sciences and engineering. This sensemaking training has been implemented in a professional sample of scientists conducting research in electrical engineering, atmospheric and computer sciences at a large multi-cultural, multi-disciplinary, and multi-university research center. A pre-post design was used to assess training effectiveness using scenario-based ethical decision-making measures. The training resulted in enhanced ethical decision-making of researchers in relation to four ethical conduct areas, namely data management, study conduct, professional practices, and business practices. In addition, sensemaking training led to researchers' preference for decisions involving the application of the broad metacognitive reasoning strategies. Individual trainee and training characteristics were used to explain the study findings. Broad implications of the findings for ethics training development, implementation, and evaluation in the sciences are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18074243     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9048-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  23 in total

1.  Ethics instruction at schools of public health in the United States. Association of Schools of Public Health Education Committee.

Authors:  S S Coughlin; W H Katz; D R Mattison
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  To transfer or not to transfer? Investigating the combined effects of trainee characteristics, team leader support, and team climate.

Authors:  K A Smith-Jentsch; E Salas; M T Brannick
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-04

3.  Medical students' cases as an empirical basis for teaching clinical ethics.

Authors:  M Huijer; E van Leeuwen; A Boenink; G Kimsma
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics.

Authors:  M W Kalichman; P J Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Teaching medical ethics: implementation and evaluation of a new course during residency training in bahrain.

Authors:  Mariam Al-Jalahma; Ebtisam Fakhroo
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2004-03

6.  The role of culture in research misconduct.

Authors:  Mark S Davis
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Individual differences in motivated social cognition: the case of self-serving information processing.

Authors:  William von Hippel; Jessica L Lakin; Richard J Shakarchi
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-10

8.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; S J Thoma
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  From seeing to being: subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations.

Authors:  Diederik A Stapel; Hart Blanton
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-10
View more
  22 in total

1.  Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management.

Authors:  Erich W Schienke; Seth D Baum; Nancy Tuana; Kenneth J Davis; Klaus Keller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A systematic approach to engineering ethics education.

Authors:  Jessica Li; Shengli Fu
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Mental models: an alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction.

Authors:  Meagan E Brock; Andrew Vert; Vykinta Kligyte; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

5.  Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context.

Authors:  Sheila Bonde; Clyde Briant; Paul Firenze; Julianne Hanavan; Amy Huang; Min Li; N C Narayanan; D Parthasarathy; Hongqin Zhao
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.

Authors:  Logan M Steele; James F Johnson; Logan L Watts; Alexandra E MacDougall; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; T H Lee Williams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Research Ethics Education in the STEM Disciplines: The Promises and Challenges of a Gaming Approach.

Authors:  Adam Briggle; J Britt Holbrook; Joseph Oppong; Joesph Hoffmann; Elizabeth K Larsen; Patrick Pluscht
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.