Literature DB >> 21099589

Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.

Jillian T Henderson1, George F Sawaya, Maya Blum, Laura Stratton, Cynthia C Harper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Requiring a pelvic examination before prescribing oral contraception poses an unnecessary barrier to contraceptive access. Medical guidelines have outlined the safety of oral contraception provision without a pelvic examination, yet little is known about the practices of clinicians providing reproductive health care. Our purpose was to investigate clinicians' requirements for pelvic examination and what may account for practice differences.
METHODS: We administered a mailed survey to a national probability sample of obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns), family medicine physicians, and advanced practice nurses specializing in obstetrics and gynecology and women's health or family medicine in 2008-2009 (N=1,196), with a response rate of 65.3%.
RESULTS: Nearly one third of ob-gyns and family medicine physicians reported always requiring a pelvic examination when prescribing oral contraception (ob-gyns 29%; family medicine 33%). A higher proportion of advanced practice nurses in primary care (45%) and a markedly lower percentage of advanced practice nurses in reproductive health (17%) reported always requiring the examination. In adjusted analyses, older clinicians were more likely to require the pelvic examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, P<.01) and clinicians serving a higher proportion of Medicaid patients more likely (OR 1.62, P<.05). Providers in private practice were more than twice as likely as those working in family-planning or community clinics to require pelvic examinations (OR 2.30, P<.01).
CONCLUSION: One third of clinicians we surveyed require pelvic examinations before provision of oral contraceptives, despite guidelines indicating they are unnecessary and research suggesting they can pose a barrier to contraceptive access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21099589      PMCID: PMC3745305          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fb540f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  26 in total

1.  Cervical neoplasia risk in women provided hormonal contraception without a Pap smear.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; C Harper; E Balistreri; J Boggess; P Darney
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the first stop demonstration project.

Authors:  C Harper; E Balistreri; J Boggess; K Leon; P Darney
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

3.  Screening for chlamydial infection: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Authors:  F H Stewart; C C Harper; C E Ellertson; D A Grimes; G F Sawaya; J Trussell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Abstinence and teenagers: prevention counseling practices of health care providers serving high-risk patients in the United States.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Amy Schalet; Davida Becker; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-06

7.  "I wouldn't be this firm if I didn't care": preventive clinical counseling for reproductive health.

Authors:  Jillian T Henderson; Tina Raine; Amy Schalet; Maya Blum; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-06-16

8.  Physicians' beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Trends in US women's use of sexual and reproductive health care services, 1995-2002.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey.

Authors:  R E Lawrence; F A Curlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  11 in total

1.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists' Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives.

Authors:  Kathrine Bendtsen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-12

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females.

Authors:  Kavita S Vinekar; Anjel Vahratian; Kelli S Hall; Brady T West; Amy Caldwell; Jason D Bell; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Jon Amastae; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Jillian T Henderson; Cynthia C Harper; Sarah Gutin; Mona Saraiya; Jocelyn Chapman; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Using behavioral economic theory to increase use of effective contraceptives among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Dennis J Hand; Stacey C Sigmon; Gary J Badger; Marjorie C Meyer; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; Ashwini Soman; Nancy Breen; Deanna Kepka; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Changes to cervical cancer prevention guidelines: effects on screening among U.S. women ages 15-29.

Authors:  Jillian T Henderson; Mona Saraiya; Gladys Martinez; Cynthia C Harper; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Hunter K Holt; George F Sawaya; Alison M El Ayadi; Jillian T Henderson; Corinne H Rocca; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 6.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.