Literature DB >> 22520645

Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users.

Kristine Hopkins1, Daniel Grossman, Kari White, Jon Amastae, Joseph E Potter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interest is growing in moving oral contraceptives over-the-counter (OTC), although concerns exist about whether women would continue to get preventive health screening. STUDY
DESIGN: We recruited cohorts of US-resident women who obtained oral contraceptives from US family planning clinics (n=532) and OTC from pharmacies in Mexico (n=514) and interviewed them four times over 9 months. Based on self-reports of having a Pap smear within 3 years or ever having had a pelvic exam, clinical breast exam and testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), we assessed the prevalence of preventive screening using Poisson regression models.
RESULTS: The prevalence of screening was high for both groups (>88% for Pap smear, pelvic exam and clinical breast exam and >71% for STI screening), while the prevalence ratios for screening were higher for clinic users, even after multivariable adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that most women would obtain reproductive health preventive screening if oral contraceptives were available OTC, and also highlight the need to improve access to preventive screening for all low-income women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520645      PMCID: PMC4418512          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  25 in total

1.  Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the first stop demonstration project.

Authors:  C Harper; E Balistreri; J Boggess; K Leon; P Darney
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Authors:  F H Stewart; C C Harper; C E Ellertson; D A Grimes; G F Sawaya; J Trussell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Screening for ovarian cancer: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Reproductive health differences among Latin American- and US-born young women.

Authors:  A M Minnis; N S Padian
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Cancer screening among Latino subgroups in the United States.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Julia E Heck
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women.

Authors:  Mohsen Bazargan; Shahrzad H Bazargan; Muhammad Farooq; Richard S Baker
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in Mexican-American pregnant women by country of birth and length of time in the United States.

Authors:  D Campos-Outcalt; K Ryan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists' Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives.

Authors:  Kathrine Bendtsen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-12

2.  Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Rick Li; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Hypertension among oral contraceptive users in El Paso, Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-11

4.  Views and attitudes of oral contraceptive users towards their availability without a prescription in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Luigi Barlassina
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Should oral contraceptive pills be available without a prescription? A systematic review of over-the-counter and pharmacy access availability.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Lianne Gonsalves; Hussain Jafri; Mary Eluned Gaffield; James Kiarie; Manjulaa L Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.