Literature DB >> 33145695

Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.

Hunter K Holt1, George F Sawaya2, Alison M El Ayadi2, Jillian T Henderson3, Corinne H Rocca2, Carolyn L Westhoff4, Cynthia C Harper2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern regarding pelvic examinations may be more common among women experiencing intimate partner violence.
OBJECTIVE: We examined women's attitudes towards pelvic examination with history of intimate partner violence (pressured to have sex, or verbal, or physical abuse).
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized trial on contraceptive access. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 18-25 were recruited at 40 reproductive health centers across the USA (2011-2013). MAIN MEASURES: Delays in clinic visits for contraception and preference to avoid pelvic examinations, by history of ever experiencing pressured sex, verbal, or physical abuse from a sexual partner, reported by frequency (never, rarely, sometimes, often). We used multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations for clustered data. KEY
RESULTS: A total of 1490 women were included. Ever experiencing pressured sex was reported by 32.4% of participants, with 16.5% reporting it rarely, 12.1% reporting it sometimes, and 3.8% reporting it often. Ever experiencing verbal abuse was reported by 19.4% and physical abuse by 10.2% of participants. Overall, 13.2% of participants reported ever having delayed going to the clinic for contraception to avoid having a pelvic examination, and 38.2% reported a preference to avoid pelvic examinations. In multivariable analysis, women reporting that they experienced pressured sex often had significantly higher odds of delaying a clinic visit for birth control (aOR 3.10 95% CI 1.39-6.84) and for reporting a preference to avoid pelvic examinations (aOR 2.91 95% CI 1.57-5.40). We found no associations between delay of clinic visits or preferences to avoid a pelvic examination and verbal or physical abuse.
CONCLUSIONS: History of pressured sex from an intimate partner is common. Among women who have experienced pressured sex, concern regarding pelvic examinations is a potential barrier to contraception. Communicating that routine pelvic examinations are no longer recommended by professional societies could potentially reduce barriers and increase preventive healthcare visits.
© 2020. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; family planning; intimate partner violence; pelvic examination; physical abuse; sexual abuse; verbal abuse

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33145695      PMCID: PMC8298732          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06334-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  29 in total

Review 1.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Authors:  F H Stewart; C C Harper; C E Ellertson; D A Grimes; G F Sawaya; J Trussell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Abuse Impedes Prevention: The Intersection of Intimate Partner Violence and HIV/STI Risk Among Young African American Women.

Authors:  Puja Seth; Gina M Wingood; LaShun S Robinson; Jerris L Raiford; Ralph J DiClemente
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-08

3.  Sexual violence, posttraumatic stress disorder, and the pelvic examination: how do beliefs about the safety, necessity, and utility of the examination influence patient experiences?

Authors:  Julie C Weitlauf; Susan M Frayne; John W Finney; Rudolf H Moos; Surai Jones; Kirsten Hu; David Spiegel
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States.

Authors:  Ann M Moore; Lori Frohwirth; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Heidi E Jones; Maryam Guiahi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Intimate Partner Violence and Effectiveness Level of Contraceptive Selection Post-Abortion.

Authors:  Laura B Drew; Mona Mittal; Marie E Thoma; Cynthia C Harper; Julia R Steinberg
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Effects of fear of abuse and possible STI acquisition on the sexual behavior of young African American women.

Authors:  Jerris L Raiford; Ralph J Diclemente; Gina M Wingood
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Effect of type and severity of intimate partner violence on women's health and service use: findings from a primary care trial of women afraid of their partners.

Authors:  Kelsey L Hegarty; Lorna J O'Doherty; Patty Chondros; Jodie Valpied; Angela J Taft; Jill Astbury; Stephanie J Brown; Lisa Gold; Ann Taket; Gene S Feder; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Distress and pain during pelvic examinations: effect of sexual violence.

Authors:  Julie C Weitlauf; John W Finney; Josef I Ruzek; Tina T Lee; Ann Thrailkill; Surai Jones; Susan M Frayne
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Estimating the effect of intimate partner violence on women's use of contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Maxwell; Karen Devries; Danielle Zionts; Jeanne L Alhusen; Jacquelyn Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.