Literature DB >> 21098663

Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Salma Kaochar1, Lisa Shanks, Ted Weinert.   

Abstract

Genomic rearrangements are common, occur by largely unknown mechanisms, and can lead to human diseases. We previously demonstrated that some genome rearrangements occur in budding yeast through the fusion of two DNA sequences that contain limited sequence homology, lie in inverted orientation, and are within 5 kb of one another. This inverted repeat fusion reaction forms dicentric chromosomes, which are well-known intermediates to additional rearrangements. We have previously provided evidence indicating that an error of stalled or disrupted DNA replication forks can cause inverted repeat fusion. Here we analyze how checkpoint protein regulatory pathways known to stabilize stalled forks affect this form of instability. We find that two checkpoint pathways suppress inverted repeat fusion, and that their activities are distinguishable by their interactions with exonuclease 1 (Exo1). The checkpoint kinase Rad53 (Chk2) and recombination protein complex MRX(MRN) inhibit Exo1 in one pathway, whereas in a second pathway the ATR-like kinases Mec1 and Tel1, adaptor protein Rad9, and effector kinases Chk1 and Dun1 act independently of Exo1 to prevent inverted repeat fusion. We provide a model that indicates how in Rad53 or MRX mutants, an inappropriately active Exo1 may facilitate faulty template switching between nearby inverted repeats to form dicentric chromosomes. We further investigate the role of Rad53, using hypomorphic alleles of Rad53 and null mutations in Rad9 and Mrc1, and provide evidence that only local, as opposed to global, activity of Rad53 is sufficient to prevent inverted repeat fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098663      PMCID: PMC3003031          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001938107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

Review 1.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome.

Authors:  Andrew J Sharp; Sierra Hansen; Rebecca R Selzer; Ze Cheng; Regina Regan; Jane A Hurst; Helen Stewart; Sue M Price; Edward Blair; Raoul C Hennekam; Carrie A Fitzpatrick; Rick Segraves; Todd A Richmond; Cheryl Guiver; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel; Peggy S Eis; Stuart Schwartz; Samantha J L Knight; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The Stability of Broken Ends of Chromosomes in Zea Mays.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1941-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

5.  Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Francene J Lemoine; Natasha P Degtyareva; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Thomas Schleker; Vanesa Rojas; Lotte Bjergbaek; José Antonio Tercero; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair.

Authors:  D Lydall; T Weinert
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1997-11

8.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 proteins Bmh1 and Bmh2 directly influence the DNA damage-dependent functions of Rad53.

Authors:  Takehiko Usui; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants.

Authors:  Xindan Jia; Ted Weinert; David Lydall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

Authors:  J E Vialard; C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mec1 and Tel1: an arresting dance of resection.

Authors:  Tracey Beyer; Ted Weinert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Coupling end resection with the checkpoint response at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Corinne Cassani; Elisa Gobbini; Diego Bonetti; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Diego Dibitetto; Achille Pellicioli; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single-stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends.

Authors:  Michela Clerici; Camilla Trovesi; Alessandro Galbiati; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  A Slowed Cell Cycle Stabilizes the Budding Yeast Genome.

Authors:  Peter J Vinton; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Novel connections between DNA replication, telomere homeostasis, and the DNA damage response revealed by a genome-wide screen for TEL1/ATM interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Brian D Piening; Dongqing Huang; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast.

Authors:  Sarah A Sabatinos; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-09-18

8.  The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks.

Authors:  Rachel Jossen; Rodrigo Bermejo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Site-specific phosphorylation of the DNA damage response mediator rad9 by cyclin-dependent kinases regulates activation of checkpoint kinase 1.

Authors:  Carla Manuela Abreu; Ramesh Kumar; Danielle Hamilton; Andrew William Dawdy; Kevin Creavin; Sarah Eivers; Karen Finn; Jeremy Lynn Balsbaugh; Rosemary O'Connor; Patrick A Kiely; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt; Muriel Grenon; Noel Francis Lowndes
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The extent of error-prone replication restart by homologous recombination is controlled by Exo1 and checkpoint proteins.

Authors:  Ellen Tsang; Izumi Miyabe; Ismail Iraqui; Jiping Zheng; Sarah A E Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.