Literature DB >> 15020465

Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants.

Xindan Jia1, Ted Weinert, David Lydall.   

Abstract

Here we examine the roles of budding-yeast checkpoint proteins in regulating degradation of dsDNA to ssDNA at unprotected telomeres (in Cdc13 telomere-binding protein defective strains). We find that Rad17, Mec3, as well as Rad24, members of the putative checkpoint clamp loader (Rad24) and sliding clamp (Rad17, Mec3) complexes, are important for promoting degradation of dsDNA in and near telomere repeats. We find that Mec1, Rad53, as well as Rad9, have the opposite role: they inhibit degradation. Downstream checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Dun1 play no detectable role in either promoting degradation or inhibiting it. These data suggest, first, that the checkpoint sliding clamp regulates and/or recruits some nucleases for degradation, and, second, that Mec1 activates Rad9 to activate Rad53 to inhibit degradation. Further analysis shows that Rad9 inhibits ssDNA generation by both Mec1/Rad53-dependent and -independent pathways. Exo1 appears to be targeted by the Mec1/Rad53-dependent pathway. Finally, analysis of double mutants suggests a minor role for Mec1 in promoting Rad24-dependent degradation of dsDNA. Thus, checkpoint proteins orchestrate carefully ssDNA production at unprotected telomeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020465      PMCID: PMC1470748          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  39 in total

1.  A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C.

Authors:  C M Green; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Dynamic interaction of DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad53 with chromatin assembly factor Asf1.

Authors:  A Emili; D M Schieltz; J R Yates; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.

Authors:  J A Melo; J Cohen; D P Toczyski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases.

Authors:  S Gangloff; C Soustelle; F Fabre
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  A Kumagai; W G Dunphy
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Y Sanchez; J Bachant; H Wang; F Hu; D Liu; M Tetzlaff; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  T Kondo; T Wakayama; T Naiki; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Asf1 links Rad53 to control of chromatin assembly.

Authors:  F Hu; A A Alcasabas; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Jerzy Majka; Peter M J Burgers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  42 in total

1.  RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion.

Authors:  Anna Malkova; Maria L Naylor; Miyuki Yamaguchi; Grzegorz Ira; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  CTC1 deletion results in defective telomere replication, leading to catastrophic telomere loss and stem cell exhaustion.

Authors:  Peili Gu; Jin-Na Min; Yang Wang; Chenhui Huang; Tao Peng; Weihang Chai; Sandy Chang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Salma Kaochar; Lisa Shanks; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Similarities and differences between "uncapped" telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  James M Dewar; David Lydall
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The MRX complex regulates Exo1 resection activity by altering DNA end structure.

Authors:  Elisa Gobbini; Corinne Cassani; Jacopo Vertemara; Weibin Wang; Fabiana Mambretti; Erika Casari; Patrick Sung; Renata Tisi; Giuseppe Zampella; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Dissection of Rad9 BRCT domain function in the mitotic checkpoint response to telomere uncapping.

Authors:  Chinonye C Nnakwe; Mohammed Altaf; Jacques Côté; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-10-31

Review 7.  Coupling end resection with the checkpoint response at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Corinne Cassani; Elisa Gobbini; Diego Bonetti; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Diego Dibitetto; Achille Pellicioli; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Structural elements required for association of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase RNA with the Est2 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Andrew S Chappell; Victoria Lundblad
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Taming the tiger by the tail: modulation of DNA damage responses by telomeres.

Authors:  David Lydall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.