Literature DB >> 21090891

Bitter avoidance in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and mice (Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus).

Kristin L Field1, Gary K Beauchamp, Bruce A Kimball, Julie A Mennella, Alexander A Bachmanov.   

Abstract

Rejection of bitter substances is common in many species and may function to protect an animal from ingestion of bitter-tasting toxins. Since many plants are bitter, it has been proposed that high tolerance for bitterness would be adaptive for herbivores. Earlier studies conducted on herbivorous guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) have been used to support this proposal. We tested guinea pigs with bitter plant secondary metabolites (salicin, caffeine, quinine hydrochloride) and bitter protein hydrolysates (two types of hydrolyzed casein, hydrolyzed soy) in a series of two-choice preference tests. For comparison, we tested two nonherbivorous mouse species (Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus). Guinea pigs did show weaker avoidance of quinine hydrochloride than did the mice, confirming predictions generated from earlier work. However, guinea pigs had similar responses to caffeine as did Peromyscus. Both of these species showed weaker avoidance responses than Mus to 10 mM caffeine. For salicin, guinea pigs were the only species to avoid it at 10 mM and their preference scores at this concentration were significantly lower than for the two mice species. Guinea pigs avoided all of the protein hydrolysates more strongly than the other species. Responses to the protein hydrolysates did not reflect the patterns observed with the simple bitter compounds, suggesting that other properties of these complex stimuli may be responsible for guinea pig avoidance of them. Our results suggest caution in accepting, without further empirical support, the premise that guinea pigs (and herbivores in general) have a generalized reduced bitter sensitivity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21090891      PMCID: PMC2999000          DOI: 10.1037/a0020792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  18 in total

1.  Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-03

2.  Food intake, water intake, and drinking spout side preference of 28 mouse strains.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed; Gary K Beauchamp; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  Peppers and poisons: the evolutionary ecology of bad taste.

Authors:  Graeme D Ruxton; Malcolm W Kennedy
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Some determinants of intake and patterns of feeding in the guinea pig.

Authors:  E Hirsch
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-11

5.  Taste responses in wild and domestic guinea pigs.

Authors:  W W Jacobs
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-05

6.  The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta-glucopyranosides.

Authors:  Bernd Bufe; Thomas Hofmann; Dietmar Krautwurst; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Taste reception.

Authors:  B Lindemann
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Suppression of bitterness by sodium: variation among bitter taste stimuli.

Authors:  P A Breslin; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Tolerance of bitter compounds by an herbivore,Cavia porcellus.

Authors:  D L Nolte; J Russell Mason; S L Lewis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.

Authors:  Kristin L Field; Alexander A Bachmanov; Julie A Mennella; Gary K Beauchamp; Bruce A Kimball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 2.  The Taste of Caffeine.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  The Bitter Taste Receptor TAS2R16 Achieves High Specificity and Accommodates Diverse Glycoside Ligands by using a Two-faced Binding Pocket.

Authors:  Anu Thomas; Chidananda Sulli; Edgar Davidson; Eli Berdougo; Morganne Phillips; Bridget A Puffer; Cheryl Paes; Benjamin J Doranz; Joseph B Rucker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.