Literature DB >> 21089784

Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography.

Esther Meyer1, Rainer Raupach, Michael Lell, Bernhard Schmidt, Marc Kachelriess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While modern clinical CT scanners under normal circumstances produce high quality images, severe artifacts degrade the image quality and the diagnostic value if metal prostheses or other metal objects are present in the field of measurement. Standard methods for metal artifact reduction (MAR) replace those parts of the projection data that are affected by metal (the so-called metal trace or metal shadow) by interpolation. However, while sinogram interpolation methods efficiently remove metal artifacts, new artifacts are often introduced, as interpolation cannot completely recover the information from the metal trace. The purpose of this work is to introduce a generalized normalization technique for MAR, allowing for efficient reduction of metal artifacts while adding almost no new ones. The method presented is compared to a standard MAR method, as well as MAR using simple length normalization.
METHODS: In the first step, metal is segmented in the image domain by thresholding. A 3D forward projection identifies the metal trace in the original projections. Before interpolation, the projections are normalized based on a 3D forward projection of a prior image. This prior image is obtained, for example, by a multithreshold segmentation of the initial image. The original rawdata are divided by the projection data of the prior image and, after interpolation, denormalized again. Simulations and measurements are performed to compare normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) to standard MAR with linear interpolation and MAR based on simple length normalization.
RESULTS: Promising results for clinical spiral cone-beam data are presented in this work. Included are patients with hip prostheses, dental fillings, and spine fixation, which were scanned at pitch values ranging from 0.9 to 3.2. Image quality is improved considerably, particularly for metal implants within bone structures or in their proximity. The improvements are evaluated by comparing profiles through images and sinograms for the different methods and by inspecting ROIs. NMAR outperforms both other methods in all cases. It reduces metal artifacts to a minimum, even close to metal regions. Even for patients with dental fillings, which cause most severe artifacts, satisfactory results are obtained with NMAR. In contrast to other methods, NMAR prevents the usual blurring of structures close to metal implants if the metal artifacts are moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: NMAR clearly outperforms the other methods for both moderate and severe artifacts. The proposed method reliably reduces metal artifacts from simulated as well as from clinical CT data. Computationally efficient and inexpensive compared to iterative methods, NMAR can be used as an additional step in any conventional sinogram inpainting-based MAR method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21089784     DOI: 10.1118/1.3484090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  91 in total

1.  Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Osamu Ikeda; Yoshitaka Tamura; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Takeshi Nakaura; Takayuki Kawano; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Improved Image Quality in Head and Neck CT Using a 3D Iterative Approach to Reduce Metal Artifact.

Authors:  W Wuest; M S May; M Brand; N Bayerl; A Krauss; M Uder; M Lell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Computed tomographic beam-hardening artefacts: mathematical characterization and analysis.

Authors:  Hyoung Suk Park; Yong Eun Chung; Jin Keun Seo
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Artifact reduction of different metallic implants in flat detector C-arm CT.

Authors:  S-C Hung; C-C Wu; C-J Lin; W-Y Guo; C-B Luo; F-C Chang; C-Y Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Steve Kohlmyer; Chi Liu; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Metal artifact correction for x-ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Andreas Keil; Dragos Constantin; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Value of monoenergetic dual-energy CT (DECT) for artefact reduction from metallic orthopedic implants in post-mortem studies.

Authors:  Laura Filograna; Nicola Magarelli; Antonio Leone; Roman Guggenberger; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael John Thali; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Optimization-based image reconstruction with artifact reduction in C-arm CBCT.

Authors:  Dan Xia; David A Langan; Stephen B Solomon; Zheng Zhang; Buxin Chen; Hao Lai; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Jussi Sillanpaa; Michael Lovelock; Boris Mueller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Clinical evaluation of the normalized metal artefact reduction algorithm caused by dental fillings in CT.

Authors:  X-Y Gong; E Meyer; X-J Yu; J-H Sun; L-P Sheng; K-H Huang; R-Z Wu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.