Literature DB >> 21086018

Rigid registration of medical images using 1D and 2D binary projections.

Panayiotis Kotsas1, Tony Dodd.   

Abstract

Image registration is a necessary procedure in everyday clinical practice. Several techniques for rigid and non-rigid registration have been developed and tested and the state-of-the-art is evolving from the research setting to incorporate image registration techniques into clinically useful tools. In this paper, we develop a novel rigid medical image registration technique which incorporates binary projections. This technique is tested and compared to the standard mutual information (MI) methods. Results show that the method is significantly more accurate and robust compared to MI methods. The accuracy is well below 0.5° and 0.5 mm. This method introduces two more improvements over MI methods: (1)for 2D registration with the use of 1D binary projections, we use minimal interpolation; and (2) for 3D registration with the use of 2D binary projections the method converges to stable final positions, independent of the initial misregistration.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21086018      PMCID: PMC3180551          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9352-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration.

Authors:  M Holden; D L Hill; E R Denton; J M Jarosz; T C Cox; T Rohlfing; J Goodey; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information.

Authors:  J P Pluim; J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration.

Authors:  Everine B van de Kraats; Graeme P Penney; Dejan Tomazevic; Theo van Walsum; Wiro J Niessen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A comparison of a similarity-based and a feature-based 2-D-3-D registration method for neurointerventional use.

Authors:  Robert A McLaughlin; John Hipwell; David J Hawkes; J Alison Noble; James V Byrne; Tim C Cox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Projection-based image registration in the presence of fixed-pattern noise.

Authors:  S C Cain; M M Hayat; E E Armstrong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  A comparison between the surface-based and mutual-information-based methods for co-registering SPECT and MR images.

Authors:  Yuan-Lin Liao; Yung-Nien Sun; Wan-Yuo Guo; Yuan-Hwa Chou; Jen-Chuen Hsieh; Yu-Te Wu
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

7.  Interpolation artifacts in sub-pixel image registration.

Authors:  Gustavo K Rohde; Akram Aldroubi; Dennis M Healy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 10.856

8.  A fast and accurate method for registration of MR images of the head.

Authors:  P Kotsas; S Malasiotis; M Strintzis; D W Piraino; J F Cornhill
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Retrospective intermodality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based.

Authors:  J West; J M Fitzpatrick; M Y Wang; B M Dawant; C R Maurer; R M Kessler; R J Maciunas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition.

Authors:  J C Bezdek; L O Hall; L P Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.