UNLABELLED: We assessed sunlight and dietary contributions to vitamin D status in British postmenopausal women. Our true longitudinal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) measurements varied seasonally, being lower in the north compared to the south and lower in Asian women. Sunlight exposure in summer and spring provided 80% total annual intake of vitamin D. INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D deficiency is highlighted as a potential problem for countries at high latitude, but there are few true longitudinal, seasonal data to allow regional comparisons. We aimed to directly compare seasonal variation in vitamin D status (25(OH)D) in postmenopausal women at two northerly latitudes and to assess the relative contributions of sunlight exposure and diet. METHODS: Vitamin D status was assessed in 518 postmenopausal women (age 55-70 years) in a two-centre cohort study with serum collected at fixed three-monthly intervals from summer 2006 for immunoassay measurement of 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone. At 57° N (Aberdeen, Scotland, UK), there were 338 Caucasian women; at 51° N (Surrey, South of England, UK), there were 144 Caucasian women and 35 Asian women. UVB exposure (polysulphone film badges) and dietary vitamin D intakes (food diaries) were also estimated. RESULTS: Caucasian women had lower 25(OH)D (p < 0.001) at 57° N compared to 51° N. Median (interquartile range) in nanomoles per litre for summer (June-August) at 57° N was 43.0 (20.9) and at 51° N was 62.5 (26.6) and for winter (December-February) at 57° N was 28.3 (18.9) and at 51° N was 39.9 (24.0). For Asian women at 51° N, median 25(OH)D was 24.0 (15.8) nmol/L in summer and 16.9 (15.9) nmol/L in winter. Median dietary vitamin D intakes were 80-100 IU for Caucasians and 50-65 IU for the Asian women. Sunlight was the main contributor to 25(OH)D with spring and summer providing >80% total annual intake. CONCLUSIONS: These longitudinal data show significant regional and ethnic differences in UVB exposure and vitamin D status for postmenopausal women at northerly latitudes. The numbers of women who are vitamin D deficient is a major concern and public health problem.
UNLABELLED: We assessed sunlight and dietary contributions to vitamin D status in British postmenopausal women. Our true longitudinal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) measurements varied seasonally, being lower in the north compared to the south and lower in Asian women. Sunlight exposure in summer and spring provided 80% total annual intake of vitamin D. INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D deficiency is highlighted as a potential problem for countries at high latitude, but there are few true longitudinal, seasonal data to allow regional comparisons. We aimed to directly compare seasonal variation in vitamin D status (25(OH)D) in postmenopausal women at two northerly latitudes and to assess the relative contributions of sunlight exposure and diet. METHODS: Vitamin D status was assessed in 518 postmenopausal women (age 55-70 years) in a two-centre cohort study with serum collected at fixed three-monthly intervals from summer 2006 for immunoassay measurement of 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone. At 57° N (Aberdeen, Scotland, UK), there were 338 Caucasian women; at 51° N (Surrey, South of England, UK), there were 144 Caucasian women and 35 Asian women. UVB exposure (polysulphone film badges) and dietary vitamin D intakes (food diaries) were also estimated. RESULTS: Caucasian women had lower 25(OH)D (p < 0.001) at 57° N compared to 51° N. Median (interquartile range) in nanomoles per litre for summer (June-August) at 57° N was 43.0 (20.9) and at 51° N was 62.5 (26.6) and for winter (December-February) at 57° N was 28.3 (18.9) and at 51° N was 39.9 (24.0). For Asian women at 51° N, median 25(OH)D was 24.0 (15.8) nmol/L in summer and 16.9 (15.9) nmol/L in winter. Median dietary vitamin D intakes were 80-100 IU for Caucasians and 50-65 IU for the Asian women. Sunlight was the main contributor to 25(OH)D with spring and summer providing >80% total annual intake. CONCLUSIONS: These longitudinal data show significant regional and ethnic differences in UVB exposure and vitamin D status for postmenopausal women at northerly latitudes. The numbers of women who are vitamin D deficient is a major concern and public health problem.
Authors: Bess Dawson-Hughes; Robert P Heaney; Michael F Holick; Paul Lips; Pierre J Meunier; Reinhold Vieth Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-03-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S A Bingham; C Gill; A Welch; A Cassidy; S A Runswick; S Oakes; R Lubin; D I Thurnham; T J Key; L Roe; K T Khaw; N E Day Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1997 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Robert P Heaney; K Michael Davies; Tai C Chen; Michael F Holick; M Janet Barger-Lux Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Walter C Willett; John B Wong; Andreas E Stuck; Hannes B Staehelin; E John Orav; Anna Thoma; Douglas P Kiel; Jana Henschkowski Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-03-23
Authors: Antje Damms-Machado; Asja Friedrich; Klaus Michael Kramer; Katrin Stingel; Tobias Meile; Markus A Küper; Alfred Königsrainer; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: A L Darling; K H Hart; H M Macdonald; K Horton; A R Kang'ombe; J L Berry; S A Lanham-New Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-04-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: E M Brouwer-Brolsma; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; R Bouillon; E J M Feskens; C J Gallagher; E Hypponen; D J Llewellyn; E Stoecklin; J Dierkes; A K Kies; F J Kok; C Lamberg-Allardt; U Moser; S Pilz; W H Saris; N M van Schoor; P Weber; R Witkamp; A Zittermann; L C P G M de Groot Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Amy E Millen; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Shirley A A Beresford; Andrea Z LaCroix; Yingye Zheng; Gary E Goodman; Mark D Thornquist; Marian L Neuhouser Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Stefan Pilz; Katharina Kienreich; Femke Rutters; Renate de Jongh; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Martin Grübler; Andreas Tomaschitz; Jacqueline M Dekker Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.810