SUMMARY: This is the first 1-year longitudinal study which assesses vitamin D deficiency in young UK-dwelling South Asian women. The findings are that vitamin D deficiency is extremely common in this group of women and that it persists all year around, representing a significant public health concern. INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of longitudinal data assessing seasonal variation in vitamin D status in young South Asian women living in northern latitudes. Studies of postmenopausal South Asian women suggest a lack of seasonal change in 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D], although it is unclear whether this is prevalent among premenopausal South Asians. We aimed to evaluate, longitudinally, seasonal changes in 25(OH)D and prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in young UK-dwelling South Asian women as compared with Caucasians. We also aimed to establish the relative contributions of dietary vitamin D and sun exposure in explaining serum 25(OH)D. METHODS: This is a 1-year prospective cohort study assessing South Asian (n = 35) and Caucasian (n = 105) premenopausal women living in Surrey, UK (51° N), aged 20-55 years. The main outcome measured was serum 25(OH)D concentration. Secondary outcomes were serum parathyroid hormone, self-reported dietary vitamin D intake and UVB exposure by personal dosimetry. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L was highly prevalent in South Asians in the winter (81 %) and autumn (79.2 %). Deficient status (below 50 nmol/L) was common in Caucasian women. Multi-level modelling suggested that, in comparison to sun exposure (1.59, 95 %CI = 0.83-2.35), dietary intake of vitamin D had no impact on 25(OH)D levels (-0.08, 95 %CI = -1.39 to 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Year-round vitamin D deficiency was extremely common in South Asian women. These findings pose great health threats regarding the adverse effects of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and warrant urgent vitamin D public health policy and action.
SUMMARY: This is the first 1-year longitudinal study which assesses vitamin D deficiency in young UK-dwelling South Asian women. The findings are that vitamin D deficiency is extremely common in this group of women and that it persists all year around, representing a significant public health concern. INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of longitudinal data assessing seasonal variation in vitamin D status in young South Asian women living in northern latitudes. Studies of postmenopausal South Asian women suggest a lack of seasonal change in 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D], although it is unclear whether this is prevalent among premenopausal South Asians. We aimed to evaluate, longitudinally, seasonal changes in 25(OH)D and prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in young UK-dwelling South Asian women as compared with Caucasians. We also aimed to establish the relative contributions of dietary vitamin D and sun exposure in explaining serum 25(OH)D. METHODS: This is a 1-year prospective cohort study assessing South Asian (n = 35) and Caucasian (n = 105) premenopausal women living in Surrey, UK (51° N), aged 20-55 years. The main outcome measured was serum 25(OH)D concentration. Secondary outcomes were serum parathyroid hormone, self-reported dietary vitamin D intake and UVB exposure by personal dosimetry. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L was highly prevalent in South Asians in the winter (81 %) and autumn (79.2 %). Deficient status (below 50 nmol/L) was common in Caucasian women. Multi-level modelling suggested that, in comparison to sun exposure (1.59, 95 %CI = 0.83-2.35), dietary intake of vitamin D had no impact on 25(OH)D levels (-0.08, 95 %CI = -1.39 to 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Year-round vitamin D deficiency was extremely common in South Asian women. These findings pose great health threats regarding the adverse effects of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and warrant urgent vitamin D public health policy and action.
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Janet M Catov; Joseph M Zmuda; Margaret E Cooper; Meredith S Parrott; James M Roberts; Mary L Marazita; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: M K Javaid; S R Crozier; N C Harvey; C R Gale; E M Dennison; B J Boucher; N K Arden; K M Godfrey; C Cooper Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-01-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Charles R Carlson; Janet Y Uriu-Adams; Christina D Chambers; Lyubov Yevtushok; Natalya Zymak-Zakutnya; Priscilla H Chan; Jordan J Schafer; Wladimir Wertelecki; Carl L Keen Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Keila Valente de Souza de Santana; Sofia Lizarralde Oliver; Marcela Moraes Mendes; Susan Lanham-New; Karen E Charlton; Helena Ribeiro Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-04-18
Authors: Isabelle Piec; Laura Cook; Samir Dervisevic; William D Fraser; Scott Ruetten; Marvin Berman; Emma English; W Garry John Journal: Curr Res Transl Med Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 4.192
Authors: Ronnie Levin; Carolina L Zilli Vieira; Marieke H Rosenbaum; Karyn Bischoff; Daniel C Mordarski; Mary Jean Brown Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: A L Darling; K H Hart; M A Gibbs; F Gossiel; T Kantermann; K Horton; S Johnsen; J L Berry; D J Skene; R Eastell; R Vieth; S A Lanham-New Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.507