Literature DB >> 21082310

Suboptimal online control of aiming movements in virtual contexts.

Louis-Nicolas Veilleux1, Luc Proteau.   

Abstract

We determined whether uncertainty about the location of one's hand in virtual environments limits the efficacy of online control processes. In the Non-aligned and Aligned conditions, the participant's hand was represented by a cursor on a vertical or horizontal display, respectively. In the Natural condition, participants saw their hand. During an acquisition phase, visual feedback was either permitted or not during movement execution. To test the hypothesis (Norris et al. 2001) that reliance on visual feedback increases as the task becomes less natural (Natural < Aligned < Non-aligned), following acquisition, participants performed a transfer phase without visual feedback. During acquisition in both visual feedback conditions, movement endpoint variability increased as the task became less natural. This suggests that the orientation of the display and the representation of one's hand by a cursor introduced uncertainty about its location, which limits the efficacy of online control processes. In contradiction with the hypothesis of Norris et al. (2001), withdrawing visual feedback in transfer had a larger deleterious effect on movement accuracy as the task became less natural. This suggests that the CNS increases the weight attributed to the input that can be processed without first having to be transformed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21082310     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2487-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition.

Authors:  D M Clower; D Boussaoud
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Hemispatial differences in visually guided aiming are neither hemispatial nor visual.

Authors:  D P Carey; E G Otto-de Haart
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Movement planning of video and of manual aiming movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2005

5.  Kinematic analysis of early online control of goal-directed reaches: a novel movement perturbation study.

Authors:  Lawrence E M Grierson; Claudia Gonzalez; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Effects of increased complexity of visuo-motor transformations on children's arm movements.

Authors:  J Bo; J L Contreras-Vidal; F A Kagerer; J E Clark
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Digby Elliot; Jamie Coull; Romeo Chua; James Lyons
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability.

Authors:  M Desmurget; Y Rossetti; C Prablanc; G E Stelmach; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.

Authors:  J D Fisk; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Stelmach; M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Congruent visual and proprioceptive information results in a better encoding of initial hand position.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Simultaneous coordinate representations are influenced by visual feedback in a motor learning task.

Authors:  Pritesh N Parmar; Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

3.  Coupled versus decoupled visuomotor feedback: Differential frontoparietal activity during curved reach planning on simultaneous functional near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography.

Authors:  Duc Trung Le; Hiroki Ogawa; Masato Tsuyuhara; Kazuki Watanabe; Tatsunori Watanabe; Ryosuke Ochi; Hisao Nishijo; Masahito Mihara; Naoto Fujita; Susumu Urakawa
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Evidence of multiple coordinate representations during generalization of motor learning.

Authors:  Pritesh N Parmar; Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Abstract spatial, but not body-related, visual information guides bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Janina Brandes; Farhad Rezvani; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.