Literature DB >> 21079918

Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Olle Månsson1, Jüri Kartus, Ninni Sernert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently the patients' own evaluation has become an important complement to post-operative clinical assessments. For many patients, there is a change in life situation after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL), which may affect the health-related quality of life in many ways. The aims of the study were to evaluate the results in terms of health-related quality of life 2-7 years after an ACL reconstruction and to compare the results with a gender- and age-matched control group. Furthermore, to compare the results for males and females using either the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BPTB) or hamstring tendon autograft (HT).
METHODS: The SF-36 questionnaire was send by mail to 793 consecutive patients after an ACL reconstruction. Five hundred and forty-four (69%) patients returned the questionnaires leaving 419 patients (161 female, 258 male) who were analysed and matched to a Swedish control group (n = 2,410).
RESULTS: The patient group obtained significantly higher scores for General Health (GH), Social Function (SF), Role Emotional (RE) and Mental Health (MH). The control group obtained significantly higher scores for Physical Function (PF) compared with the total ACL group and with the BPTB and HS subgroups. There were no significant differences between males and females.
CONCLUSION: After ACL reconstruction, the patients reported good health-related quality of life in comparison with a matched sample of the general population. To incorporate non-disease-specific health assessment measures are important to further refine the disease-specific outcome measurements to evaluate the effect of the treatments and provide cost-effective treatment algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21079918     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1303-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite collegiate athletes.

Authors:  David R McAllister; Albert M Tsai; Jason L Dragoo; Justin McWilliams; Frederick J Dorey; Sharon L Hame; Gerald A M Finerman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a 5-9 year follow-up.

Authors:  A L Ruiz; M Kelly; R W Nutton
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender.

Authors:  J D Ferrari; B R Bach; C A Bush-Joseph; T Wang; J Bojchuk
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population.

Authors:  M Sullivan; J Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  N Mohtadi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later.

Authors:  Karen K Briggs; Jack Lysholm; Yelverton Tegner; William G Rodkey; Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Eva Möller; Lars Weidenhielm; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees.

Authors:  Karen K Briggs; J Richard Steadman; Connor J Hay; Sophia L Hines
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  9 in total

1.  Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Alberto Grassi; Federico Raggi; Andrea Visani; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

2.  Donor-site-related functional problems following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: development of a self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanna Aufwerber; Maria Hagströmer; Annette Heijne
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Maria Hagströmer; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A multisport epidemiologic comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school athletics.

Authors:  Allan M Joseph; Christy L Collins; Natalie M Henke; Ellen E Yard; Sarah K Fields; R Dawn Comstock
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-01-25

7.  Cost-utility analysis of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus early reconstruction after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Martin Bierbaum; Oliver Schöffski; Benedikt Schliemann; Clemens Kösters
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-02-06

8.  No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Anil Kapoor; Ashwani Soni; Sourabh Khatri; Gladson David Masih; Mukta Raghav
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:" A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Anil Kapoor; Ashwani Soni; Sourabh Khatri; Gladson David Masih; Mukta Raghav
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.