Literature DB >> 32850031

No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ravi Gupta1, Anil Kapoor2, Ashwani Soni2, Sourabh Khatri2, Gladson David Masih2, Mukta Raghav2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The type of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a topic of debate and there is still no clear consensus on the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery between hamstring tendon graft and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty professional athletes were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups by computerized randomization. In Group I, ACL reconstruction was done using BPTB graft, and in Group II, ACL reconstruction was done using semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI). Postoperatively, patients were assessed for knee stability, Lysholm score, and WOMAC score.
RESULTS: Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 1 year was 2.31 ± 1.68 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.52 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4); and at 2 years, it was 1.98 ± 1.62 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.23 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4). Mean Lysholm score at 2 years was 96.1 ± 5.81 in STGPI cohort and 97.3 ± 4.62 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.15). Mean WOMAC score at 2 years was 3.3 ± 2.76 in STGPI cohort and 2.84 ± 2.21 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.25). Graft rupture rate was 3.75%; 3 patients in each group had graft rupture. Kneeling pain was present in 15% (12/80) of patients with BPTB graft whereas none of the patients in STGPI cohort had kneeling pain.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference between two grafts in term of knee stability, visual analog scale score and functional outcome. However, hamstring tendon graft is associated with less donor site morbidity. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; bone-patellar tendon-bone; hamstring tendon graft

Year:  2020        PMID: 32850031      PMCID: PMC7429638          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00073-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  44 in total

1.  The association between radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee symptoms, function and quality of life 10-15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  B E Oiestad; I Holm; L Engebretsen; M A Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Olle Månsson; Jüri Kartus; Ninni Sernert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Justin Roe; Leo A Pinczewski; Vivianne J Russell; Lucy J Salmon; Tomomaro Kawamata; Melvin Chew
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts.

Authors:  J Kartus; T Movin; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Annja Viset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Quadriceps Tendon-Bone or Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts When Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Osman Riaz; Adeel Aqil; Ashim Mannan; Fahad Hossain; Mubusher Ali; Gautam Chakrabarty; Graham Radcliffe
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Yimeng Yang; Ji Li; Hao Zhang; Yangmu Fu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Hytham Salem; Kirsten E Ross; Eric Secrist; Michael C Ciccotti; Fotios Tjoumakaris; Michael G Ciccotti; Kevin B Freedman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-14

10.  Patellar tendon ossification after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone--patellar tendon--bone autograft.

Authors:  Gianluca Camillieri; Vincenzo Di Sanzo; Matteo Ferretti; Cosma Calderaro; Vittorio Calvisi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.