Literature DB >> 18034333

Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Pia Thomeé1, Peter Währborg, Mats Börjesson, Roland Thomeé, B I Eriksson, Jon Karlsson.   

Abstract

The knee self-efficacy scale (K-SES) has been shown to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness during rehabilitation for patients' perceived self-efficacy of knee function. Determinants of self-efficacy of knee function 1 year after ACL reconstruction have been found to be the patients' internal locus of control and knee symptoms in sports and recreation. The predictive ability of perceived self-efficacy of knee function measured by the K-SES has not been studied in terms of patient outcome after an ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential for pre-operative self-efficacy of knee function measured by the K-SES to predict patient outcome in terms of physical activity, knee symptoms and muscle function 1 year after an ACL reconstruction. Thirty-eight patients were evaluated for outcome in terms of physical activity with the Tegner activity scale and the physical activity scale (PAS), knee symptoms with the Lysholm knee scoring scale and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and knee function with ability tests for muscle function 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Multiple regression and logistic multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the K-SES as a possible predictor of outcome. The patients' present perceived self-efficacy of knee function (K-SES(Present)) pre-operatively was a significant predictor (P = 0.016) of the patients returning to their intensity and frequency of physical activity (PAS) 1 year after ACL reconstruction, when adjusted for age, gender and pre-injury physical activity level (Tegner(Pre-injury)) (odds ratio = 2.1). The patients' perceived future self-efficacy of knee function (K-SES(Future)) pre-operatively was a significant predictor (P = 0.045) of their self-rated knee function in sports/recreational activities (KOOS(Sports/recreation)) at the 1-year follow-up, when adjusted for age, gender and Tegner(Pre-injury )(R (2 )=0.25). The pre-operative K-SES(Future) was also a significant predictor (P = 0.023) of the patients' knee-related quality of life (KOOS(Qol)), at the 1-year follow-up, when adjusted for age, gender and Tegner(Pre-injury) (R (2 )=0.23). The pre-operative K-SES(Future) was furthermore a significant predictor of an acceptable outcome 1 year after surgery, on the Lysholm knee scoring scale (P = 0.003, odds ratio = 1.7), as well as on KOOS(Sports/recreation) (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 1.6) and knee-related quality of life (KOOS(Qol)) (P = 0.037, odds ratio = 1.4), when adjusted for age, gender and Tegner(Pre-injury). The pre-operative K-SES(Future) was also a significant predictor (P = 0.04) of an acceptable outcome 1 year after surgery, on the one-leg hop for distance (odds ratio = 2.2), when adjusted for age, gender and Tegner(Pre-injury). In conclusion, this study indicates that patients' perceived self-efficacy of knee function pre-operatively is of predictive value for their return to acceptable levels of physical activity, symptoms and muscle function 1 year after ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18034333     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0433-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete.

Authors:  J Karlsson; J Kartus; L Magnusson; J Larsson; S Brandsson; B I Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Brandsson; J Kartus; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Sagittal plane knee translation and electromyographic activity during closed and open kinetic chain exercises in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient patients and control subjects.

Authors:  J Kvist; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients.

Authors:  Jayne L Anderson; Sallie E Lamb; Karen L Barker; Stephanie Davies; Christopher A Dodd; David J Beard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

5.  Human agency in social cognitive theory.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-09

6.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  M A Risberg; I Holm; H Steen; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A comparison of results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female and male competitive athletes. A two- to five-year follow-up of 429 patients.

Authors:  P Wiger; S Brandsson; J Kartus; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  64 in total

1.  Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Masood Mazaheri; Mojdeh Khorrami; Hossein Negahban
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Olle Månsson; Jüri Kartus; Ninni Sernert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Bengt Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Thomas M Best; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a study of health-related quality of life based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

Authors:  Björn Barenius; Magnus Forssblad; Björn Engström; Karl Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Longitudinal changes in psychosocial factors and their association with knee pain and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Giorgio Zeppieri; Trevor A Lentz; Susan M Tillman; Michael W Moser; Peter A Indelicato; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06-23

9.  Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain.

Authors:  David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Patients' views on responsibility for the management of musculoskeletal disorders--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria E H Larsson; Lena A Nordholm; Ingbritt Ohrn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.