Literature DB >> 20000550

Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization.

César I Torres1, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Prathap Parameswaran, Andrew Kato Marcus, Greg Wanger, Yuri A Gorby, Bruce E Rittmann.   

Abstract

Anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) are able to transfer electrons contained in organic substrates to a solid electrode. The selection of ARB should depend on the anode potential, which determines the amount of energy available for bacterial growth and maintenance. In our study, we investigated how anode potential affected the microbial diversity of the biofilm community. We used a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) containing four graphite electrodes, each at a different anode potential (E(anode) = -0.15, -0.09, +0.02, and +0.37 V vs SHE). We used wastewater-activated sludge as inoculum, acetate as substrate, and continuous-flow operation. The two electrodes at the lowest potentials showed a faster biofilm growth and produced the highest current densities, reaching up to 10.3 A/m(2) at the saturation of an amperometric curve; the electrode at the highest potential produced a maximum of 0.6 A/m(2). At low anode potentials, clone libraries showed a strong selection (92-99% of total clones) of an ARB that is 97% similar to G. sulfurreducens. At the highest anode potential, the ARB community was diverse. Cyclic voltammograms performed on each electrode suggest that the ARB grown at the lowest potentials carried out extracellular electron transport exclusively by conducting electrons through the extracellular biofilm matrix. This is supported by scanning electron micrographs showing putative bacterial nanowires and copious EPS at the lowest potentials. Non-ARB and ARB using electron shuttles in the diverse community for the highest anode potential may have insulated the ARB using a solid conductive matrix from the anode. Continuous-flow operation and the selective pressure due to low anode potentials selected for G. sulfurreducens, which are known to consume acetate efficiently and use a solid conductive matrix for electron transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20000550     DOI: 10.1021/es902165y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  46 in total

1.  Electrical conductivity in a mixed-species biofilm.

Authors:  Nikhil S Malvankar; Joanne Lau; Kelly P Nevin; Ashley E Franks; Mark T Tuominen; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of electrode potentials on the microbial community of photo bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Yicheng Wu; Yue Zheng; Yong Xiao; Zejie Wang; Feng Zhao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Microbial population and functional dynamics associated with surface potential and carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Tony Phan; Greg Wanger; Kenneth H Nealson; Yuji Sekiguchi; Yuri A Gorby; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Ohmic resistance affects microbial community and electrochemical kinetics in a multi-anode microbial electrochemical cell.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  J Power Sources       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 9.127

6.  High Biofilm Conductivity Maintained Despite Anode Potential Changes in a Geobacter-Enriched Biofilm.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hodon Ryu; Hao Ren; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Junkseck Chae; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.928

7.  Microbial activity influences electrical conductivity of biofilm anode.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Junyoung Sim; Hodon Ryu; Hao Ren; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Junseok Chae; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Syntrophic association and performance of Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, Aeromonas and Tetrathiobacter as anodic biocatalysts for bioelectricity generation in dual chamber microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Smita S Kumar; Sandeep K Malyan; Suddhasatwa Basu; Narsi R Bishnoi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Combining microbial cultures for efficient production of electricity from butyrate in a microbial electrochemical cell.

Authors:  Joseph F Miceli; Ines Garcia-Peña; Prathap Parameswaran; César I Torres; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Geothrix fermentans secretes two different redox-active compounds to utilize electron acceptors across a wide range of redox potentials.

Authors:  Misha G Mehta-Kolte; Daniel R Bond
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.