Literature DB >> 24351938

Microbial population and functional dynamics associated with surface potential and carbon metabolism.

Shun'ichi Ishii1, Shino Suzuki2, Trina M Norden-Krichmar2, Tony Phan2, Greg Wanger2, Kenneth H Nealson3, Yuji Sekiguchi4, Yuri A Gorby3, Orianna Bretschger2.   

Abstract

Microbial extracellular electron transfer (EET) to solid surfaces is an important reaction for metal reduction occurring in various anoxic environments. However, it is challenging to accurately characterize EET-active microbial communities and each member's contribution to EET reactions because of changes in composition and concentrations of electron donors and solid-phase acceptors. Here, we used bioelectrochemical systems to systematically evaluate the synergistic effects of carbon source and surface redox potential on EET-active microbial community development, metabolic networks and overall electron transfer rates. The results indicate that faster biocatalytic rates were observed under electropositive electrode surface potential conditions, and under fatty acid-fed conditions. Temporal 16S rRNA-based microbial community analyses showed that Geobacter phylotypes were highly diverse and apparently dependent on surface potentials. The well-known electrogenic microbes affiliated with the Geobacter metallireducens clade were associated with lower surface potentials and less current generation, whereas Geobacter subsurface clades 1 and 2 were associated with higher surface potentials and greater current generation. An association was also observed between specific fermentative phylotypes and Geobacter phylotypes at specific surface potentials. When sugars were present, Tolumonas and Aeromonas phylotypes were preferentially associated with lower surface potentials, whereas Lactococcus phylotypes were found to be closely associated with Geobacter subsurface clades 1 and 2 phylotypes under higher surface potential conditions. Collectively, these results suggest that surface potentials provide a strong selective pressure, at the species and strain level, for both solid surface respirators and fermentative microbes throughout the EET-active community development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24351938      PMCID: PMC3996694          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  45 in total

Review 1.  Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan; Bert Hamelers; René Rozendal; Uwe Schröder; Jürg Keller; Stefano Freguia; Peter Aelterman; Willy Verstraete; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Peter Aelterman; Stefano Freguia; Jurg Keller; Willy Verstraete; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Quantification of the internal resistance distribution of microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Yanzhen Fan; Evan Sharbrough; Hong Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Kazuya Watanabe; Soichi Yabuki; Bruce E Logan; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Electricity generation from model organic wastewater in a cassette-electrode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Takefumi Shimoyama; Shoko Komukai; Akira Yamazawa; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Bruce E Logan; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction.

Authors:  Karrie A Weber; Laurie A Achenbach; John D Coates
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 8.  Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction.

Authors:  Derek R Lovley; Dawn E Holmes; Kelly P Nevin
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.517

9.  Lactococcus chungangensis sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from activated sludge foam.

Authors:  Sung-Lim Cho; Sun-Woo Nam; Jung-Hoon Yoon; Jung-Sook Lee; Ampaitip Sukhoom; Wonyong Kim
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Subsurface clade of Geobacteraceae that predominates in a diversity of Fe(III)-reducing subsurface environments.

Authors:  Dawn E Holmes; Regina A O'Neil; Helen A Vrionis; Lucie A N'guessan; Irene Ortiz-Bernad; Maria J Larrahondo; Lorrie A Adams; Joy A Ward; Julie S Nicoll; Kelly P Nevin; Milind A Chavan; Jessica P Johnson; Philip E Long; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  33 in total

1.  Resilience, Dynamics, and Interactions within a Model Multispecies Exoelectrogenic-Biofilm Community.

Authors:  Anna Prokhorova; Katrin Sturm-Richter; Andreas Doetsch; Johannes Gescher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Divergent Nrf Family Proteins and MtrCAB Homologs Facilitate Extracellular Electron Transfer in Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Bridget E Conley; Peter J Intile; Daniel R Bond; Jeffrey A Gralnick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of anode surface chemistry on microbial fuel cell operation.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Sofia Babanova; Kateryna Artyushkova; Jose A Cornejo; Linnea Ista; Orianna Bretschger; Enrico Marsili; Plamen Atanassov; Andrew J Schuler
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.373

4.  Microbial biofilms are able to destroy hydroxyapatite in the absence of host immunity in vitro.

Authors:  Adam Feliks Junka; Patrycja Szymczyk; Danuta Smutnicka; Marcin Kos; Iryna Smolina; Marzenna Bartoszewicz; Edward Chlebus; Michal Turniak; Parish P Sedghizadeh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Dynamic Changes in Soil Microbial Communities with Glucose Enrichment in Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells.

Authors:  Jimmy Kuo; Daniel Liu; Shuai-Hao Wang; Chorng-Horng Lin
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Competition of two highly specialized and efficient acetoclastic electroactive bacteria for acetate in biofilm anode of microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Veerraghavulu Sapireddy; Krishna P Katuri; Ali Muhammad; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.290

7.  How Comparable are Microbial Electrochemical Systems around the Globe? An Electrochemical and Microbiological Cross-Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Sofia Babanova; Pierangela Cristiani; Kateryna Artyushkova; Plamen Atanassov; Alain Bergel; Orianna Bretschger; Robert K Brown; Kayla Carpenter; Alessandra Colombo; Rachel Cortese; Benjamin Erable; Falk Harnisch; Mounika Kodali; Sujal Phadke; Sebastian Riedl; Luis F M Rosa; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.928

8.  A lithotrophic microbial fuel cell operated with pseudomonads-dominated iron-oxidizing bacteria enriched at the anode.

Authors:  Thuy Thu Nguyen; Tha Thanh Thi Luong; Phuong Hoang Nguyen Tran; Ha Thi Viet Bui; Huy Quang Nguyen; Hang Thuy Dinh; Byung Hong Kim; Hai The Pham
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  Bidirectional electroactive microbial biofilms and the role of biogenic sulfur in charge storage and release.

Authors:  Paniz Izadi; Marten Niklas Gey; Nicolas Schlüter; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Microbial metabolic networks in a complex electrogenic biofilm recovered from a stimulus-induced metatranscriptomics approach.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Aaron Tenney; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Kenneth H Nealson; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.