Literature DB >> 21072671

Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system.

Shohei Yamaguchi1, Daisuke Yoshida, Hajime Kenmotsu, Takefumi Yasunaga, Kozo Konishi, Satoshi Ieiri, Hideaki Nakashima, Kazuo Tanoue, Makoto Hashizume.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing skills are important for advanced laparoscopic surgery. However, objective assessment of these skills has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to assess the laparoscopic suturing skills of novice and experienced surgeons using an electromagnetic motion-tracking system.
METHODS: A total of 18 surgeons, who were all right-handed, were divided into the following two groups according to their experience as an operator in laparoscopic surgery: 9 novice surgeons (fewer than 10 laparoscopic procedures) and 9 experienced surgeons (more than 50 laparoscopic procedures). The subjects performed an intracorporeal suturing task in an inanimate box laparoscopic trainer while the movements of their forceps were evaluated using an electromagnetic motion-tracking system. Their laparoscopic skills were assessed on the basis of the time, path length, and average speed of the forceps in each hand.
RESULTS: Experienced surgeons completed the suturing task significantly faster than novice surgeons did. The left path length was significantly shorter for experienced surgeons than for novice surgeons, whereas the right path lengths did not differ. The right average speed of knot tying was significantly faster for experienced surgeons than for novice surgeons, whereas the left average speeds did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic suturing using an electromagnetic motion-tracking system revealed better results for experienced surgeons than for novice surgeons in terms of the time taken, left path length, and right speed of knot-tying. Furthermore, surgical proficiency due to experience can affect surgical dexterity of each hand differently. The present study also demonstrates the efficacy of this system for objective evaluation of laparoscopic suturing skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21072671     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Reliability of the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester for bimanual tasks.

Authors:  N K Francis; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-01

2.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills.

Authors:  C D Smith; T M Farrell; S S McNatt; R E Metreveli
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?

Authors:  A Cuschieri; N Francis; J Crosby; G B Hanna
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater.

Authors:  Aristotelis Dosis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Fernando Bello; Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Duncan Gillies; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-03

6.  Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; F Bello; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Motion analysis in the training and assessment of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  Teaching basic video skills as an aid in laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  J K Champion; J Hunter; T Trus; W Laycock
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

10.  Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.

Authors:  T A Emam; G Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  27 in total

1.  Skill acquisition and stress adaptations following laparoscopic surgery training and detraining in novice surgeons.

Authors:  Blair T Crewther; Kunal Shetty; Delaram Jarchi; Shaun Selvadurai; Christian J Cook; Daniel R Leff; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the 10-year history of a 2-day standardized laparoscopic surgical skills training program at Kyushu University.

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Munenori Uemura; Hajime Kenmotsu; Kozo Konishi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Ken Okazaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Procedural surgical skill assessment in laparoscopic training environments.

Authors:  Munenori Uemura; Pierre Jannin; Makoto Yamashita; Morimasa Tomikawa; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Satoshi Obata; Ryota Souzaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment.

Authors:  J B Pagador; F M Sánchez-Margallo; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J A Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; S Enciso-Sanz; J Usón-Gargallo; J Moreno
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Aung Myint Oo; Sang-Yong Son; Dong Joon Shin; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Motaz Alyafi; Tomonori Hada; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessment of Intracorporeal Suturing in Single-Port Surgery Using an Experimental Suturing Model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ishiyama; Noriyuki Inaki; Hiroyuki Bando; Tetsuji Yamada
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Analysis of the posture pattern during robotic simulator tasks using an optical motion capture system.

Authors:  Kenta Takayasu; Kenji Yoshida; Takao Mishima; Masato Watanabe; Tadashi Matsuda; Hidefumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24

10.  Learning curve on the TrEndo laparoscopic simulator compared to an expert level.

Authors:  Pieter J van Empel; Joris P Commandeur; Lennart B van Rijssen; Mathilde G E Verdam; Judith A Huirne; Fedde Scheele; H Jaap Bonjer; W Jeroen Meijerink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.