Literature DB >> 15781796

Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater.

Aristotelis Dosis1, Rajesh Aggarwal, Fernando Bello, Krishna Moorthy, Yaron Munz, Duncan Gillies, Ara Darzi.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Objective assessment of surgical skill has recently been shown to be possible through the use of dexterity-based and video analysis systems. The aim of this study was to synchronize these 2 modalities to produce a comprehensive surgical assessment tool.
DESIGN: The Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device is a dexterity-based motion analysis device that has been developed in the Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology by the Surgical Computing and Imaging Research Group. Further advances to this system have been made to enable synchronized acquisition of hand kinematics and video from real procedures, and their concurrent analysis. To test the feasibility of the system, 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 5 different surgeons on consenting patients were recorded. Analysis focused on the entire procedure and also on specific parts of the operation such as the clipping and cutting of the cystic duct and artery.
RESULTS: Dexterity analysis was performed using the objective measures of time, path length, number of movements, velocities, and trajectories. Comparative analysis of a surgeon's dexterity was carried out on the whole procedure and by using the synchronized zoom facility in the software. Kinematic signals revealed rapid changes in velocity caused by alternating between different instruments or occurring after complications such as bleeding.
CONCLUSION: This new motion analysis system has been shown to be an effective tool for the comprehensive assessment of operative procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781796     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.3.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  38 in total

1.  Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system.

Authors:  S Jayaraman; A L Trejos; M D Naish; A Lyle; R V Patel; C M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system.

Authors:  Shohei Yamaguchi; Daisuke Yoshida; Hajime Kenmotsu; Takefumi Yasunaga; Kozo Konishi; Satoshi Ieiri; Hideaki Nakashima; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions.

Authors:  Yohannes Kassahun; Bingbin Yu; Abraham Temesgen Tibebu; Danail Stoyanov; Stamatia Giannarou; Jan Hendrik Metzen; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Idle time: an underdeveloped performance metric for assessing surgical skill.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Drew N Rutherford; Rebecca D Ray; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Elaine R Cohen; Andrea Mason; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Motion tracking systems for assessment of surgical skill.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Thor Milland; Pavlos Papasavas; Aristotelis Dosis; Fernando Bello; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Requirements for the structured recording of surgical device data in the digital operating room.

Authors:  Max Rockstroh; Stefan Franke; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS.

Authors:  George Xeroulis; Adam Dubrowski; Ken Leslie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment.

Authors:  J B Pagador; F M Sánchez-Margallo; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J A Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; S Enciso-Sanz; J Usón-Gargallo; J Moreno
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.