| Literature DB >> 21067579 |
Stewart T G Burgess1, David Frew, Francesca Nunn, Craig A Watkins, Tom N McNeilly, Alasdair J Nisbet, John F Huntley.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infestation of ovine skin with the ectoparasitic mite Psoroptes ovis results in a rapid cutaneous immune response, leading to the crusted skin lesions characteristic of sheep scab. Little is known regarding the mechanisms by which such a profound inflammatory response is instigated and to identify novel vaccine and drug targets a better understanding of the host-parasite relationship is essential. The main objective of this study was to perform a combined network and pathway analysis of the in vivo skin response to infestation with P. ovis to gain a clearer understanding of the mechanisms and signalling pathways involved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21067579 PMCID: PMC3091762 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Profile plot of 1,552 genes significantly differentially expressed during time course of infestation with . Gene expression profiles for differentially expressed genes over the time course of infestation with P. ovis. Control (Time = 0), 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours post-infestation. Each line represents a single gene, colour coded by log normalised intensity values
qRT-PCR validation of microarray data
| Gene Symbol | Microarray fold change | qRT-PCR fold change | Correlation* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hr | 3 hr | 6 hr | 24 hrs | 1 hr | 3 hr | 6 hr | 24 hrs | ||
| 4.9 | 14.6 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 41.0 | 127.4 | 52.6 | 5.2 | 0.99 | |
| 103.3 | 771.7 | 193.0 | 15.2 | 6.4 | 11.9 | 6.1 | 1.4 | 0.92 | |
| 44.0 | 311.9 | 231.6 | 454.6 | 21.7 | 244.5 | 293.8 | 477.4 | 0.96 | |
| 3.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 2 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.95 | |
| 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | |
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.68 | |
| 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 0.99 | |
| 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.96 | |
| 2.0 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.83 | |
| 4.2 | 19.5 | 28.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 0.8 | 0.97 | |
| 6.7 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 1.4 | 0.86 | |
Key - Comparisons between baseline samples (time = 0) and individual time points. *Correlations performed using Pearson's correlation co-efficient for highly expressed genes, i.e. IL1B, IL6, IL8, TNF, TLR4, TLR2, IL4 and CSF2 and Spearman's rank correlation co-efficient for genes with lower expression levels, i.e. IL10, IL18 and TGFBI
Peak temporal gene expression clusters following infestation with P. ovis
| Cluster ID | Cluster Description | Number of genes in cluster (% of total) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Immediate early (IE) up | 81 (5.2) |
| 2 | Early (E) up | 201 (12.9) |
| 3 | Intermediate (IM) up | 344 (22.2) |
| 4 | Late (L) up | 383 (24.7) |
| 5 | Immediate early (IE) repressed | 6 (0.4) |
| 6 | Early (E) repressed | 35 (2.3) |
| 7 | Intermediate (IM) repressed | 289 (18.6) |
| 8 | L (L) repressed | 213 (13.7) |
Figure 2Clustered mean temporal gene expression profiles following infestation with . Mean gene expression profiles for gene expression clusters 1-8. Time (hours) post infestation highlighted on X-axis and the mean fold change compared to time zero sample on the Y-axis. Baseline = non-infected, IE = immediate early, E = early, IM = intermediate and L = late
Top 10 fold-changing genes from each temporal cluster following infestation with P. ovis
| Cluster ID | Gene Symbol | Gene Description | Fold Change* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmembrane protein 123 | 19.3 | ||
| CD83 molecule | 9.1 | ||
| Activating transcription factor 3 | 7.5 | ||
| Cysteine-rich, angiogenic inducer, 61 | 5.4 | ||
| BTG family, member 2 | 5.3 | ||
| early growth response 1 | 4.5 | ||
| cysteine-rich, angiogenic inducer, 61 | 4.5 | ||
| G protein-coupled receptor 171 | 4.4 | ||
| growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta | 4.1 | ||
| Interleukin-6 | 771.7 | ||
| Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 | 35.7 | ||
| Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 | 22.7 | ||
| Unknown | N/A | 19.1 | |
| Selectin P (granule membrane protein 140 kDa, antigen CD62) | 17.2 to 18.1 | ||
| Suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 | 18.0 | ||
| colony stimulating factor 3 (granulocyte) | 17.6 | ||
| phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific (phosphodiesterase E4 dunce homolog, Drosophila) | 17.1 | ||
| tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 6 | 16.7 | ||
| Pentraxin 3 | 225.6 to 317.2 | ||
| Matrix metallopeptidase 1 (interstitial collagenase) | 237.1 to 302.8 | ||
| Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 | 218.0 | ||
| Serine dehydratase | 134.3 | ||
| Metallothionein 1E | 76.9 | ||
| pleckstrin | 48.8 | ||
| membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A, member 8B | 45.2 | ||
| superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial | 31.5 | ||
| Interleukin-8 | 291.7 to 617.4 | ||
| Small proline-rich protein 2A | 324.5 | ||
| Casein beta | 174.7 | ||
| small proline-rich protein 2E | 109.7 to 163.2 | ||
| Lactotransferrin | 121.9 | ||
| S100 calcium binding protein A9 | 90.9 | ||
| asialoglycoprotein receptor 2 | 66.4 | ||
| S100 calcium binding protein A12 | 66.3 | ||
| Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 2 | -4.6 | ||
| Unknown | N/A | -2.1 | |
| Zinc activated ligand-gated ion channel | -2.0 | ||
| Heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 | -1.7 | ||
| ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 2 | -1.7 | ||
| Fibrinogen-like 2 | -1.6 | ||
| Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 | -5.0 | ||
| Thioredoxin interacting protein | -3.4 to -3.9 | ||
| Unknown | N/A | -2.8 | |
| Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade F, member 1 | -2.7 | ||
| Frizzled homolog 2 | -2.6 to -2.7 | ||
| Complement component 3 | -2.4 | ||
| Fc fragment of IgG binding protein | -2.3 | ||
| Serum deprivation response | -19.7 | ||
| nitric oxide synthase trafficker | -6.6 | ||
| Family with sequence similarity 13, member C | -5.8 | ||
| Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (p57, Kip2) | -5.8 | ||
| Unknown | N/A | -5.6 | |
| Lix1 homolog (mouse)-like | -5.5 | ||
| Scavenger receptor class A, member 5 (putative) | -5.3 | ||
| collagen, type III, alpha 1 | -4.9 to -5.1 | ||
| Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily F, polypeptide 1 | -29.2 | ||
| CAP, adenylate cyclase-associated protein, 2 | -28.5 | ||
| Loricrin | -26.3 | ||
| Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 | -23.4 | ||
| Stathmin-like 2 | -12.9 | ||
| GDNF family receptor alpha 2 | -11.5 | ||
| Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B | -9.3 | ||
| Filaggrin | -8.6 | ||
| Keratin 1 | -7.0 | ||
| Flavin containing monooxygenase 3 | -6.4 |
Key - *Fold change calculated relative to baseline samples (Time = 0), range given where 2 or more probes for a gene are present. #Cluster 5 contained only 6 genes
Top five canonical pathways associated with each gene cluster following infestation with P. ovis
| Temporal cluster* | Canonical Pathway | p-valueA |
|---|---|---|
| IL12 signalling and production in macrophages | 5.4E-05 | |
| IL10 signalling | 6.9E-05 | |
| Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling | 1.3E-04 | |
| PPAR signalling | 2.9E-04 | |
| Production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in macrophages | 1.0E-09 | |
| Dendritic cell maturation | 1.8E-09 | |
| TREM1 signalling | 1.8E-09 | |
| NF-kB signalling | 6.7E-09 | |
| IL10 signalling | 3.7E-06 | |
| NF-kB signalling | 1.6E-05 | |
| Acute phase response signalling | 6.1E-05 | |
| TREM1 signalling | 2.4E-04 | |
| Leukocyte extravasation signalling | 2.9E-05 | |
| Antigen presentation pathway | 3.9E-05 | |
| T helper cell differentiation | 1.7E-04 | |
| CD28 signalling in T helper cells | 1.9E-04 | |
| Role of pattern recognition receptors in recognition of bacteria and viruses | 2.9E-06 | |
| Acute phase response signalling | 8.7E-05 | |
| Role of macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in RA# | 1.0E-03 | |
| Wnt/beta-catenin signalling | 2.3E-02 | |
| Antiproliferative role of somatostatin receptor 2 | 7.1E-03 | |
| CCR5 signalling in macrophages | 3.8E-02 | |
| Integrin signalling | 5.8E-02 | |
| IL1 signalling | 7.7E-02 | |
| BMP signalling pathway | 2.3E-02 | |
| TGF beta signalling | 2.8E-02 | |
| IL6 signalling | 3.8E-02 | |
| Wnt/beta-catenin signalling | 5.1E-02 |
Key - *Cluster 5 contained too few genes for effective analysis of canonical pathways. #Rheumatoid arthritis. Ap-value calculated using Fisher's exact test determining the probability that association between genes in the data set and canonical pathway is due to chance alone
Figure 3IPA network depicting relationships among transcription factor encoding genes in cluster 1, 1 hour post-infestation with . Merged representation of the two highest scoring networks. Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships. Red circles highlight roles for JUN, NF-kB and TNF. Only direct interactions selected
Figure 4IPA network depicting relationships among pro-inflammatory genes in cluster 2, 3 hours post-infestation with . Merged representation of the four highest scoring networks. Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships. Red circles highlight roles for IL1A, IL1B, IL6, NF-kB, TLR2 and TLR4. Only direct interactions selected
Figure 5IPA network depicting relationships among pro-inflammatory genes in cluster 3, 6 hours post-infestation with . Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships. Red circles highlight roles for NF-kB, IFNGR1 and IFNGR2. Network score = 38.
Figure 6IPA network depicting relationships among genes in cluster 3, 6 hours post-infestation with . Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships. Red circles highlight roles for MT1E, MT2A and SOD. Network score = 31.
Figure 7IPA representation of the canonical pathway for leukocyte extravasation signalling in cluster 4, 24 hours post-infestation with . Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships
Figure 8IPA representation of IgE and pro-Th2 genes in network 3 from cluster 4, 24 hours post-infestation with . Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, red indicating up-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships. Red circles highlight roles for FCER1A, FCER1G, FCGR3A, FCGR1A and selected MHC complex genes. Network score = 31.
Figure 9IPA representation of the complement system pathway enriched in cluster 6, 3 hours post-infestation with . Individual nodes represent protein functions with relationships represented by edges. Nodes coloured by gene expression, green indicating down-regulation and white indicating gene/factor not differentially expressed but with defined relationship to other genes in network. Arrows indicate directional relationships