Literature DB >> 19852965

Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.

Emily K Piper1, Louise A Jackson, Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann, Cedric Gondro, Ala E Lew-Tabor, Nicholas N Jonsson.   

Abstract

Cattle demonstrate divergent and heritable phenotypes of resistance and susceptibility to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Bos indicus cattle are generally more resistant to tick infestation than Bos taurus breeds although large variations in resistance can occur within subspecies and within breed. Increased tick resistance has been previously associated with an intense hypersensitivity response in B. taurus breeds; however, the mechanism by which highly resistant B. indicus cattle acquire and sustain high levels of tick resistance remains to be elucidated. Using the commercially available Affymetrix microarray gene expression platform, together with histological examination of the larval attachment site, this study aimed to describe those processes responsible for high levels of tick resistance in Brahman (B. indicus) cattle that differ from those in low-resistance Holstein-Friesian (B. taurus) cattle. We found that genes involved in inflammatory processes and immune responsiveness to infestation by ticks, although up-regulated in tick-infested Holstein-Friesian cattle, were not up-regulated in Brahman cattle. In contrast, genes encoding constituents of the extracellular matrix were up-regulated in Brahmans. Furthermore, the susceptible Holstein-Friesian animals displayed a much greater cellular inflammatory response at the site of larval R. microplus attachment compared with the tick-resistant Brahman cattle. (c) 2009 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852965     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  19 in total

1.  The RIPK2 gene: a positional candidate for tick burden supported by genetic associations in cattle and immunological response of knockout mouse.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto Neto; Nicholas N Jonsson; Aaron Ingham; Rowan J Bunch; Blair E Harrison; William Barendse
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks.

Authors:  J K Marima; C L Nel; M C Marufu; N N Jonsson; B Dube; K Dzama
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Cellular responses to Rhipicephalus microplus infestations in pre-sensitised cattle with differing phenotypes of infestation.

Authors:  Munyaradzi C Marufu; Kennedy Dzama; Michael Chimonyo
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  One Health approach to identify research needs in bovine and human babesioses: workshop report.

Authors:  Adalberto A Pérez de León; Daniel A Strickman; Donald P Knowles; Durland Fish; Eileen Thacker; José de la Fuente; Peter J Krause; Stephen K Wikel; Ryan S Miller; Gale G Wagner; Consuelo Almazán; Robert Hillman; Matthew T Messenger; Paul O Ugstad; Roberta A Duhaime; Pete D Teel; Alfonso Ortega-Santos; David G Hewitt; Edwin J Bowers; Stephen J Bent; Matt H Cochran; Terry F McElwain; Glen A Scoles; Carlos E Suarez; Ronald Davey; Jeanne M Howell Freeman; Kimberly Lohmeyer; Andrew Y Li; Felix D Guerrero; Diane M Kammlah; Pamela Phillips; Joe M Pound
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Transcriptional changes in the peripheral blood leukocytes from Brangus cattle before and after tick challenge with Rhipicephalus australis.

Authors:  Emily F Mantilla Valdivieso; Elizabeth M Ross; Ali Raza; Muhammad Noman Naseem; Muhammad Kamran; Ben J Hayes; Nicholas N Jonsson; Peter James; Ala E Tabor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.547

6.  Transcriptomic analysis of the temporal host response to skin infestation with the ectoparasitic mite Psoroptes ovis.

Authors:  Stewart T G Burgess; David Frew; Francesca Nunn; Craig A Watkins; Tom N McNeilly; Alasdair J Nisbet; John F Huntley
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Ectoparasite loads in sympatric urban populations of the northern white-breasted and the European hedgehog.

Authors:  Sylwia Dziemian; Bożena Sikora; Barbara Piłacińska; Jerzy Michalik; Rafał Zwolak
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Alessandra Mara Franzin; Sandra Regina Maruyama; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Rosane Pereira Oliveira; José Marcos Chaves Ribeiro; Richard Bishop; Antônio Augusto Mendes Maia; Daniela Dantas Moré; Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira; Isabel Kinney Ferreira de Miranda Santos
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Differential responsiveness of Holstein and Angus dermal fibroblasts to LPS challenge occurs without major differences in the methylome.

Authors:  Aimee L Benjamin; Benjamin B Green; Brian A Crooker; Stephanie D McKay; David E Kerr
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative immune responses against Psoroptes ovis in two cattle breeds with different susceptibility to mange.

Authors:  Charlotte Sarre; Ana González-Hernández; Stefanie Van Coppernolle; Rika Grit; Korneel Grauwet; Frederik Van Meulder; Koen Chiers; Wim Van den Broeck; Peter Geldhof; Edwin Claerebout
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.