Literature DB >> 21063863

Intestinal interposition for benign esophageal disease.

Racquel Smith Bueno, Carlos Galvani, Santiago Horgan.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Various options exist for intestinal interposition for benign, but debilitating, end-stage esophageal disorders. Principally, the stomach, colon, or jejunum is used for esophageal replacement. Much debate exists regarding the ideal esophageal replacement option. The conduit choice must be tailored to the individual patient. Unlike malignant processes, the conduit choice for benign disorders must be sufficiently durable and functional. Colonic interposition meets both criteria. However, this operative procedure's technical difficulty increases the complexity of this already challenging clinical problem, as seemingly small errors in judgment and technique can significantly impact graft viability and long-term function. Using a gastric tube also provides durability and functionality, but with an operative procedure that is less technically demanding. A minimally invasive laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy offers the patient even more benefit in terms of shorter operative times and intensive care unit and recovery periods. However, the advent of surgical robotic technology augments these benefits even further. Robotic technology arms the surgeon with improved dexterity and three-dimensional visualization. These revolutionary improvements allow the surgeon to overcome many of the operative limitations that exist with the open and minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy, thus potentially offering patients reduced morbidity and mortality rates.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21063863     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-008-0006-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  22 in total

Review 1.  Does the interponat affect outcome after esophagectomy for cancer?

Authors:  J D Urschel
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results.

Authors:  M M Young; C Deschamps; V F Trastek; M S Allen; D L Miller; C D Schleck; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Temporary placement of an expandable polyester silicone-covered stent for treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Massimo Conio; Claudio De Angelis; Edda Battaglia; Alessandro Musso; Rinaldo Pellicano; Matteo Goss; Giovanna Venezia; Mario Rizzetto; Giorgio Saracco
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; Gilbert R Upchurch; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Esophageal replacement for end-stage benign esophageal disease.

Authors:  T J Watson; T R DeMeester; W K Kauer; J H Peters; J A Hagen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Transhiatal esophageal resection for corrosive injury.

Authors:  Narendar Mohan Gupta; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Pietro Renzulli; Alexander Joeris; Oliver Strobel; Annemarie Hilt; Christoph A Maurer; Waldemar Uhl; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  C A Galvani; M V Gorodner; F Moser; G Jacobsen; C Chretien; N J Espat; P Donahue; S Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.