BACKGROUND: Gastric tube interposition has become the method of choice for esophageal replacement after esophagectomy. Colon interposition, on the other hand, is widely considered to be a method of last resort, associated with high morbidity and mortality. The present study reviews our experience with colon interposition for esophageal replacement. PATIENTS: Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing colon interposition for esophageal replacement between 1 January 1994 and 31 July 2001 were reviewed. Outcome was compared with international publications on colon interposition as well as with our results following gastric tube interposition (fundus rotation gastroplasty). RESULTS: Fourteen men and five women with a median age of 68 years (range 44-78) underwent colon interposition for benign ( n=9) and malignant ( n=10) lesions. Eighteen patients underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis, and one patient underwent thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. Surgical morbidity was 36.8% (7/19). Anastomotic insufficiency and fatal mediastinal bleeding occurred in one patient each (5.3%). No cases of graft necrosis were observed, and no re-operations were necessary. In-hospital mortality was 15.8% (3/19), twice due to surgical complications (abdominal sepsis, mediastinal bleeding) and once due to pulmonary and cardiac failure. As a late complication, four patients (21.1%) developed anastomotic strictures that necessitated repeated endoscopic dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube interposition remains the method of choice for esophageal replacement. Colon interposition, however, is a valuable alternative with a good long-term function. Early mortality, however, remains a matter of serious concern.
BACKGROUND:Gastric tube interposition has become the method of choice for esophageal replacement after esophagectomy. Colon interposition, on the other hand, is widely considered to be a method of last resort, associated with high morbidity and mortality. The present study reviews our experience with colon interposition for esophageal replacement. PATIENTS: Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing colon interposition for esophageal replacement between 1 January 1994 and 31 July 2001 were reviewed. Outcome was compared with international publications on colon interposition as well as with our results following gastric tube interposition (fundus rotation gastroplasty). RESULTS: Fourteen men and five women with a median age of 68 years (range 44-78) underwent colon interposition for benign ( n=9) and malignant ( n=10) lesions. Eighteen patients underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis, and one patient underwent thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. Surgical morbidity was 36.8% (7/19). Anastomotic insufficiency and fatal mediastinal bleeding occurred in one patient each (5.3%). No cases of graft necrosis were observed, and no re-operations were necessary. In-hospital mortality was 15.8% (3/19), twice due to surgical complications (abdominal sepsis, mediastinal bleeding) and once due to pulmonary and cardiac failure. As a late complication, four patients (21.1%) developed anastomotic strictures that necessitated repeated endoscopic dilatation. CONCLUSIONS:Gastric tube interposition remains the method of choice for esophageal replacement. Colon interposition, however, is a valuable alternative with a good long-term function. Early mortality, however, remains a matter of serious concern.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H A Gaissert; D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; R A Malt; J C Wain; A C Moncure; J H Kim; P R Mueller; R DeAngelis; L W Ottinger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jade Brown; Wyn G Lewis; Antonio Foliaki; Geoffrey W B Clark; Guy R J C Blackshaw; David S Y Chan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.452