Literature DB >> 11093504

Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results.

M M Young1, C Deschamps, V F Trastek, M S Allen, D L Miller, C D Schleck, P C Pairolero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic's experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease.
METHODS: From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6-95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11093504     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01916-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eric M Pauli; Steve J Schomisch; Joseph P Furlan; Andrea S Marks; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with prior antireflux or hiatal hernia surgery.

Authors:  Andrew C Chang; Julia S Lee; Konrad T Sawicki; Allan Pickens; Mark B Orringer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Thoracic inlet located corrosive oesophageal strictures.

Authors:  Ro Ofoegbu
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-01

4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: early experience in British Columbia.

Authors:  Mayur Brahmania; Eric Lam; Jennifer Telford; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Esophagectomy after anti-reflux surgery.

Authors:  K Robert Shen; Karen M Harrison-Phipps; Stephen D Cassivi; Dennis Wigle; Francis C Nichols; Mark S Allen; Christina M Wood; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome.

Authors:  Abdollah Behzadi; Francis C Nichols; Stephen D Cassivi; Claude Deschamps; Mark S Allen; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Intestinal interposition for benign esophageal disease.

Authors:  Racquel Smith Bueno; Carlos Galvani; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02

9.  Gastrectomy as a remedial operation for failed fundoplication.

Authors:  Valerie A Williams; Thomas J Watson; Oliver Gellersen; Sebastian Feuerlein; Daniela Molena; Lelan F Sillin; Carolyn Jones; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Sternotomy after retrosternal esophagogastric anastomotic disruption: a case report.

Authors:  Hassan Jamal-Eddine; Murugan Sukumar; Nael Al-Sarraf
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.