Literature DB >> 3520014

Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

G W Drach, S Dretler, W Fair, B Finlayson, J Gillenwater, D Griffith, J Lingeman, D Newman.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy effectively fragments urinary calculi in the upper urinary tract and upper ureter. These fragments pass completely by 3 months in 77.4 per cent of the patients with single stones. Risk of obstruction, increased postoperative pain, need for additional urological operations and retained fragments are low for stones less than 1 cm. in size. As the number of stones treated or single stone size increases above 1 cm. the risk for these factors increases. Adjunctive urological surgical management is required in 9 per cent of the patients preoperatively and 8 per cent postoperatively. Only 0.6 per cent of the patients require some type of open operation to resolve the stone problems after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Hemorrhage, obstruction by fragments, severe pain and urinary infection all constitute known complications and require careful urological management of all patients. Hospitalization averages 2 days after treatment and patients usually return to work within a few days after they are discharged from the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3520014     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)46015-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  44 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones: a single institution experience.

Authors:  E Lindström; K Borch; E P Kullman; H G Tiselius; I Ihse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  ESWL by a second generation unit in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  T Matsuda; T Tachibana; H Abe; M Ohkuwa; T Kanamaru
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

4.  Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Kuddusi Pancaroglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

5.  High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone.

Authors:  Phillip Mucksavage; Wesley A Mayer; Jeff E Mandel; Keith N Van Arsdalen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Chronology of the development].

Authors:  F Eisenberger; C Chaussy; B Forssmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Acute changes of serum markers for tissue damage after ESWL of kidney stones.

Authors:  I Apostolov; N Minkov; M Koycheva; M Isterkov; M Abadjyev; V Ondeva; T Trendafilova
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.

Authors:  Fabio Nussberger; Beat Roth; Tobias Metzger; Bernhard Kiss; George N Thalmann; Roland Seiler
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Calyceal stones: fate of shock wave therapy with respect to stone localization.

Authors:  A Koşar; K Türkölmez; K Sarica; Y Z Müftüoğlu; O Gögüş; K Aydos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Use of external shock-wave lithotripsy and adjuvant ursodiol for treatment of radiolucent gallstones. A national multicenter study.

Authors:  D Burnett; A Ertan; R Jones; J P O'Leary; R Mackie; J E Robinson; G Salen; L Stahlgren; D H Van Thiel; L Vassy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.