Literature DB >> 21062928

Phase III clinical trial development: a process of chutes and ladders.

David M Dilts1, Steven K Cheng, Joshua S Crites, Alan B Sandler, James H Doroshow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Institute of Medicine report on cooperative groups and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) report from the Operational Efficiency Working Group both recommend changes to the processes for opening a clinical trial. This article provides evidence for the need for such changes by completing the first comprehensive review of all the time and steps required to open a phase III oncology clinical trial and discusses the effect of time to protocol activation on subject accrual.
METHODS: The Dilts and Sandler method was used at four cancer centers, two cooperative groups, and the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Accrual data were also collected.
RESULTS: Opening a phase III cooperative group therapeutic trial requires 769 steps, 36 approvals, and a median of approximately 2.5 years from formal concept review to study opening. Time to activation at one group ranged from 435 to 1,604 days, and time to open at one cancer center ranged from 21 to 836 days. At centers, group trials are significantly more likely to have zero accruals (38.8%) than nongroup trials (20.6%; P < 0.0001). Of the closed NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved phase III clinical trials from 2000 to 2007, 39.1% resulted in <21 accruals.
CONCLUSIONS: The length, variability, and low accrual results demonstrate the need for the NCI clinical trials system to be reengineered. Improvements will be of only limited effectiveness if done in isolation; there is a need to return to the collaborative spirit with all parties creating an efficient and effective system. Recommendations put forth by the Institute of Medicine and Operational Efficiency Working Group reports, if implemented, will aid this renewal. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21062928      PMCID: PMC3058405          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

1.  The costs of conducting clinical research.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Lowell E Schnipper; Deborah Y Kamin; Jenifer Levinson; Allen S Lichter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A national cancer clinical trials system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program.

Authors:  John F Scoggins; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Time to activate lung cancer clinical trials and patient enrollment: a representative comparison study between two academic centers across the atlantic.

Authors:  Andrea Wang-Gillam; Kristina Williams; Silvia Novello; Feng Gao; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Ramaswamy Govindan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a Cooperative Oncology Group: the Case of Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler; Matthew Baker; Steven K Cheng; Stephen L George; Kathleen S Karas; Stephen McGuire; Gourija S Menon; Jason Reusch; Debbie Sawyer; Maren Scoggins; Amy Wu; Kai Zhou; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Steps and time to process clinical trials at the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler; Steven K Cheng; Joshua S Crites; Lori B Ferranti; Amy Y Wu; Shanda Finnigan; Steven Friedman; Margaret Mooney; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Personalizing cancer care: American Society of Clinical Oncology presidential address 2009.

Authors:  Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Development of clinical trials in a cooperative group setting: the eastern cooperative oncology group.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan Sandler; Steven Cheng; Joshua Crites; Lori Ferranti; Amy Wu; Robert Gray; Jean MacDonald; Donna Marinucci; Robert Comis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Challenges to accrual predictions to phase III cancer clinical trials: a survey of study chairs and lead statisticians of 248 NCI-sponsored trials.

Authors:  Anneke T Schroen; Gina R Petroni; Hongkun Wang; Monika J Thielen; Daniel Sargent; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Walter M Cronin; Donald L Wickerham; Xiaofei F Wang; Robert Gray; Wendy F Cohn; Craig L Slingluff; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Invisible barriers to clinical trials: the impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies.

Authors:  Steven K Cheng; Mary S Dietrich; David M Dilts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  21 in total

1.  US cancer trials may go the way of the Oldsmobile.

Authors:  David Dilts
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Darlene R Kitterman; Steven K Cheng; David M Dilts; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  A virtual national laboratory for reengineering clinical translational science.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Daniel Rosenblum; William M Trochim
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Evaluating protocol lifecycle time intervals in HIV/AIDS clinical trials.

Authors:  Scott R Rosas; Jeffrey T Schouten; Dennis Dixon; Suresh Varghese; Marie T Cope; Joe Marci; Jonathan M Kagan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network: An Effective Infrastructure for Addressing Important Issues in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical Trial Characteristics and Barriers to Participant Accrual: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience over 30 years, a Historical Foundation for Trial Improvement.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Steven I Sherman; Mellanie Price; Jun Weng; Suzanne E Davis; David S Hong; James C Yao; Aman Buzdar; George Wilding; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Clinical trials in the era of personalized oncology.

Authors:  Michael L Maitland; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Modifying the Clinical Research Infrastructure at a Dedicated Clinical Trials Unit: Assessment of Trial Development, Activation, and Participant Accrual.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Kenneth R Hess; Dwana Sanders; Suzanne E Davis; Aman U Buzdar; Razelle Kurzrock; J Jack Lee; Funda Meric-Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  From Famine to Feast: Developing Early-Phase Combination Immunotherapy Trials Wisely.

Authors:  Daphne Day; Arta M Monjazeb; Elad Sharon; S Percy Ivy; Eric H Rubin; Gary L Rosner; Marcus O Butler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The Children's Oncology Group's 2013 five year blueprint for research.

Authors:  Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.