Literature DB >> 14559889

The costs of conducting clinical research.

Ezekiel J Emanuel1, Lowell E Schnipper, Deborah Y Kamin, Jenifer Levinson, Allen S Lichter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physicians frequently receive payment for enrolling subjects onto clinical trials. Some view these payments as conflicts of interest. Others contend that these payments are necessary reimbursements for conducting clinical research. We evaluated the clinical and nonclinical hours and costs associated with conducting a mock phase III clinical research trial.
METHODS: We collected data from representatives of 21 clinical sites, on the numbers of hours associated with 13 activities necessary to the conduct of clinical research. The hours were based on enrolling 20 patients in a 12-month randomized placebo-controlled trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. The outcome measures were disease progression and quality-of-life reports. These costs were evaluated for both government and pharmaceutical industry-sponsored trials.
RESULTS: On average, 4,012 hours (range, 1,512 to 13,319 hours) were required for a government-sponsored trial, and 3,998 hours (range: 1735 to 15,699) were required for a pharmaceutical industry-sponsored trial involving 20 subjects with 17 office visits, or approximately 200 hours per subject. Thirty-two percent of the hours were devoted to nonclinical activities, such as institutional review board submission and completion of clinical reporting forms. On average, excluding overhead expenses, it cost slightly more than 6,094 dollars (range, 2,098 dollars to 19,285 dollars) per enrolled subject for an industry-sponsored trial, including 1,999 dollars devoted to nonclinical costs.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our mock trial, the time required for nontreatment trial activities is considerable, and the associated costs are substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559889     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  62 in total

1.  Shortcomings in the clinical evaluation of new drugs: acute myeloid leukemia as paradigm.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Noel S Weiss; Richard A Larson; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Commentary: timing is everything.

Authors:  Robin Zon
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Challenges to National Cancer Institute-Supported Cooperative Group Clinical Trial Participation: An ASCO Survey of Cooperative Group Sites.

Authors:  Allison R Baer; Chelsey A Kelly; Suanna S Bruinooge; Carolyn D Runowicz; Douglas W Blayney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Basic steps to building a research program.

Authors:  Allison Baer; Naftali Bechar; Gary Cohen; Susan Devine
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Cancer registries: a novel alternative to long-term clinical trial follow-up based on results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Y Nancy You; Heidi Nelson; Mark S Allen; David Winchester; Andrew Stewart; Tonia Young-Fadok; Paul A Decker; Erin M Green; Sara J Holton; Karla V Ballman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Prioritizing Future Research on Allopurinol and Febuxostat for the Management of Gout: Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jutkowitz; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Hyon K Choi; Karen M Kuntz; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Improving cancer outcomes through international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey S Abrams; Ralph M Meyer; Fabien Calvo; Eduardo Cazap; James Deye; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Denis Lacombe; Max Parmar; Nita Seibel; Lalitha Shankar; Ann Marie Swart; Patrick Therasse; Bhadrasain Vikram; Remy von Frenckell; Michael Friedlander; Keiichi Fujiwara; Richard S Kaplan; Francoise Meunier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Lessons learned: Infrastructure development and financial management for large, publicly funded, international trials.

Authors:  Gregg S Larson; Cate Carey; Jesper Grarup; Fleur Hudson; Karen Sachi; Michael J Vjecha; Fred Gordin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  A screening tool to enhance clinical trial participation at a community center involved in a radiation oncology disparities program.

Authors:  Julian W Proctor; Elaine Martz; Larry L Schenken; Rebecca Rainville; Ursula Marlowe
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Antitumor efficacy testing in rodents.

Authors:  Melinda G Hollingshead
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.