Literature DB >> 27852698

Modifying the Clinical Research Infrastructure at a Dedicated Clinical Trials Unit: Assessment of Trial Development, Activation, and Participant Accrual.

Chad Tang1, Kenneth R Hess2, Dwana Sanders3, Suzanne E Davis4, Aman U Buzdar5,6, Razelle Kurzrock7, J Jack Lee2, Funda Meric-Bernstam3, David S Hong8.   

Abstract

Purpose: Information on processes for trials assessing investigational therapeutics is sparse. We assessed the trial development processes within the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (ICT) at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and analyzed their effects on the trial activation timeline and enrolment.Experimental Design: Data were from a prospectively maintained registry that tracks all clinical studies at MD Anderson. From this database, we identified 2,261 activated phase I-III trials; 221 were done at the ICT. ICT trials were matched to trials from other MD Anderson departments by phase, sponsorship, and submission year. Trial performance metrics were compared with paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
Results: We identified three facets of the ICT research infrastructure: parallel processing of trial approval steps; a physician-led research team; and regular weekly meetings to foster research accountability. Separate analyses were conducted stratified by sponsorship [industry (133 ICT and 133 non-ICT trials) or institutional (68 ICT and 68 non-ICT trials)]. ICT trial development was faster from IRB approval to activation (median difference of 1.1 months for industry-sponsored trials vs. 2.3 months for institutional) and from activation to first enrolment (median difference of 0.3 months for industry vs. 1.2 months for institutional; all matched P < 0.05). ICT trials also accrued more patients (median difference of 8 participants for industry vs. 33.5 for institutional) quicker (median difference 4.8 participants/year for industry vs. 11.1 for institutional; all matched P < 0.05).Conclusions: Use of a clinical research-focused infrastructure within a large academic cancer center was associated with efficient trial development and participant accrual. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1407-13. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852698      PMCID: PMC5872813          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  Time to activate lung cancer clinical trials and patient enrollment: a representative comparison study between two academic centers across the atlantic.

Authors:  Andrea Wang-Gillam; Kristina Williams; Silvia Novello; Feng Gao; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Ramaswamy Govindan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Predicting Low Accrual in the National Cancer Institute's Cooperative Group Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Caroline S Bennette; Scott D Ramsey; Cara L McDermott; Josh J Carlson; Anirban Basu; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Achieving sufficient accrual to address the primary endpoint in phase III clinical trials from U.S. Cooperative Oncology Groups.

Authors:  Anneke T Schroen; Gina R Petroni; Hongkun Wang; Monika J Thielen; Robert Gray; Jacqueline Benedetti; Xiaofei F Wang; Daniel J Sargent; Donald L Wickerham; Walter Cronin; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Invisible barriers to clinical trials: the impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies.

Authors:  Steven K Cheng; Mary S Dietrich; David M Dilts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Project Zero Delay: a process for accelerating the activation of cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Razelle Kurzrock; Susan Pilat; Marcel Bartolazzi; Dwana Sanders; Jill Van Wart Hood; Stanley D Tucker; Kevin Webster; Michael A Mallamaci; Steven Strand; Eileen Babcock; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?

Authors:  Kristian D Stensland; Russell B McBride; Asma Latif; Juan Wisnivesky; Ryan Hendricks; Nitin Roper; Paolo Boffetta; Simon J Hall; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea M Denicoff; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stephen S Grubbs; Suanna S Bruinooge; Robert L Comis; Peggy Devine; David M Dilts; Michelle E Duff; Jean G Ford; Steven Joffe; Lidia Schapira; Kevin P Weinfurt; Margo Michaels; Derek Raghavan; Ellen S Richmond; Robin Zon; Terrance L Albrecht; Michael A Bookman; Afshin Dowlati; Rebecca A Enos; Mona N Fouad; Marjorie Good; William J Hicks; Patrick J Loehrer; Alan P Lyss; Steven N Wolff; Debra M Wujcik; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical Trial Characteristics and Barriers to Participant Accrual: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience over 30 years, a Historical Foundation for Trial Improvement.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Steven I Sherman; Mellanie Price; Jun Weng; Suzanne E Davis; David S Hong; James C Yao; Aman Buzdar; George Wilding; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Present Status and Perspectives on Future Roles of Japanese Clinical Research Coordinators.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yanagawa; Hiroshi Nokihara; Hideto Yokoi; Hitoshi Houchi; Masahiro Nagai; Risako Yamashita; Narufumi Suganuma; Masamitsu Hyodo
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  An investigation into the factors affecting investigator-initiated trial start-up in Ireland.

Authors:  Lauren Leddy; Prasanth Sukumar; Lydia O'Sullivan; Fionnuala Keane; Declan Devane; Peter Doran
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Moving Beyond the Momentum: Innovative Approaches to Clinical Trial Implementation.

Authors:  Cathy Eng; Emerson Y Chen; Jane Rogers; Mark Lewis; Jonathan Strosberg; Ramya Thota; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Paul Oberstein; Rang Govindarajan; Gary Buchschacher; Sandip Patel; Davendra Sohal; Taymeyah Al-Toubah; Philip Philip; Arvind Dasari; Hagan Kennecke; Stacey Stein
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.