Literature DB >> 18496332

Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level.

Shuhua Yang1, Xinghuo Wu, Yong Hu, Jin Li, Guohui Liu, Weihua Xu, Cao Yang, Shunan Ye.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Our clinical study design was prospective, concurrently enrolled and single-center trial of the new functional intervertebral cervical disc prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) in the treatment of patients with single-level and multiple-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.
OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to investigate the surgical technology skills and clinical effects of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis in Chinese, and to observe the stability and range of movement in the early and immediate postoperative period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recently, motion preservation has come to the forefront of emerging technologies in spine surgery. This is the important background information of the emergence of cervical arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis that offers the promise of restoring normal spinal movement and reduces a kinematic strain on adjacent segments.
METHODS: Nineteen patients (23 discs) had spinal arthroplasty with placement of the Bryan cervical artificial disc prosthesis in our hospital. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed. The radiographic parameters evaluated included the treated segments and the overall curvature of the cervical spine.
RESULTS: All the patients were observed up from 8 months to 42 months (average 24 months). According to Odom's scale, all of 19 patients (23 levels) had excellent to good outcome. The range of movement recovered to the preoperative value during the follow up. The treated segment ultimately showed preservation of movement when compared with preoperative levels. No prosthesis subsidence or excursion was identified.
CONCLUSION: Arthroplasty using the Bryan disc seemed to be safe and provided encouraging clinical and radiologic outcome in our study. Although early and intermediate results are promising, this is also a relatively new approach, long-term follow up studies are required to prove its efficacy and its ability to prevent adjacent segment disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496332     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Operated and adjacent segment motions for fusion versus cervical arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tomoya Terai; Ahmad Faizan; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Cervical arthroplasty using the Bryan Cervical Disc System].

Authors:  Friedrich Weber; Michael Detzner
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Ding-Jun Hao; Yu-Li Ma; Da-Geng Huang; Hou-Kun Li; Hang Feng; Qian Hou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-31

6.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery versus total disc replacement: A comparative study with minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Dong Yang; Yan-Bo Zhu; Suo-Zhou Yan; Jun Di; Da-Long Yang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparisons of three anterior cervical surgeries in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  RuoFu Zhu; HuiLin Yang; ZhiDong Wang; GenLin Wang; MinJie Shen; Quan Yuan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.