Literature DB >> 21050649

Motives for surgical-orthodontic treatment and effect of treatment on psychosocial well-being and satisfaction: a prospective study of 118 patients.

Jesper Oland1, John Jensen, Ask Elklit, Birte Melsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective, controlled study of consecutive surgical-orthodontic patients was performed to assess how treatment affects the patients' psychosocial well-being. We evaluated patients' treatment motivations and motive fulfillment in relation to their satisfaction with the treatment and assessed the correlation between their satisfaction and their psychosocial well-being. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 adult patients (51 men and 67 women, mean age 25 years) who had undergone surgical-orthodontic treatment were examined before the preoperative orthodontic treatment and 12 months after surgery or later. The motives for treatment, fulfillment of those motives, psychosocial well-being, and degree of post-treatment satisfaction were assessed using questionnaires validated for Danish patients. A total of 47 age- and gender-matched subjects without any current or previous need for orthodontic or surgical-orthodontic treatment served as the controls.
RESULTS: The patients stated oral function and appearance as their main treatment motives, and most reported that their motives had been fulfilled. Both their motives and the actual fulfillment of their motives influenced their treatment satisfaction. Another significant outcome of treatment was improved self-concept and social interaction. The more self-concept and social interaction were improved by treatment, the greater the post-treatment satisfaction the patients expressed.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical-orthodontic treatment has significant potential to improve patients' psychosocial well-being. Patients' satisfaction with treatment correlated with the post-treatment psychosocial status. However, pretreatment motives significantly influenced the overall satisfaction after treatment. Thus, patients who weighted oral function motives greatest expressed the lowest degree of treatment satisfaction.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050649     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  12 in total

1.  Experiences Of Individuals Concerning Combined Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgical Treatment: A Qualitative Twitter Analysis.

Authors:  Guy D Watts; Panagiotis Christou; Gregory S Antonarakis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 2.  Oral health-related quality of life before, during, and after orthodontic-orthognathic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victorine E H W Brouns; Anne-Lieke M L de Waal; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; Agnes Andrade Martins; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; José Stechman-Neto; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Odilon Guariza-Filho; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Evaluation of Patients' Satisfaction after Class III Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Osvaldo Magro-Filho; Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Derly Tescaro Narcizo Oliveira; Lidia Pimenta Martins; Marcio Salazar; Rodrigo Antonio De Medeiros; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

5.  Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Rosanna Guarnieri; Martina Mezio; Federica Altieri; Giulia Brandetti; Gabriella Padalino; Roberto Di Giorgio; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  Decision Making from the Experience of Orthognathic Surgery Patients: A Grounded Theory Approach.

Authors:  N R Paul; S R Baker; B J Gibson
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Changes in cephalometric variables after orthognathic surgery and their relationship to patients' quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  Tahereh Baherimoghaddam; Morteza Oshagh; Navid Naseri; Nariman Iraji Nasrbadi; Sepideh Torkan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-12-29

8.  Assessment of the Quality of Life in Moroccan Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Latifa Elmouden; Lahecn Ousehal
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-04-11

9.  Soft tissue changes after mandibular setback and bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients.

Authors:  Davor Jokić; Dražen Jokić; Vedran Uglešić; Darko Macan; Predrag Knežević
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life in patients with different dentofacial deformities: longitudinal study of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) with at least 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Jacco G Tuk; Jerome A Lindeboom; Misha L Tan; J de Lange
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.