Literature DB >> 26557610

Evaluation of Patients' Satisfaction after Class III Orthognathic Surgery.

Osvaldo Magro-Filho1, Marcelo Coelho Goiato2, Derly Tescaro Narcizo Oliveira3, Lidia Pimenta Martins3, Marcio Salazar3, Rodrigo Antonio De Medeiros2, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-planned orthognathic surgery improves psychological health, aesthetics and function of patients. AIM: The present study aimed to investigate patients' satisfaction after orthognathic surgery by means of a satisfaction questionnaire before and after surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 patients was selected (17 women and 12 men), with a mean age of 28 years, randomly selected from a private clinic at Araçatuba - São Paulo by two investigators. Anamnesis and clinical examination were performed. Subjects with facial deformities submitted to orthodontic treatment before and after orthognathic surgery with a minimum post-surgery period of 6 months, answered a satisfaction questionnaire composed of 10 questions regarding dental and facial aesthetics. In this study, the maximum satisfaction score was 10.
RESULTS: Regarding aesthetics, two satisfaction parameters were investigated: dental and facial. For all indices, the average satisfaction was up to score 7.
CONCLUSION: According to the results, it can be concluded that orthognathic surgery has been an effective treatment for dentofacial deformities, aesthetics and functional problems, what was verified by pre and postoperative questionnaire application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic; Class III Angle’s classification; Psychology

Year:  2015        PMID: 26557610      PMCID: PMC4625329          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14633.6587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  37 in total

1.  The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide.

Authors:  M Power; A Harper; M Bullinger
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: II. Validity and responsiveness testing.

Authors:  Susan J Cunningham; Andrew M Garratt; Nigel P Hunt
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.383

3.  Satisfaction of orthognathic surgical patients in a Malaysian population.

Authors:  K K Siow; S T Ong; C B Lian; W C Ngeow
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.556

4.  Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Tracey L Shell; Michael G Woods
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.

Authors:  Jenny R Maple; Katherine W L Vig; F Michael Beck; Peter E Larsen; Shiva Shanker
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data.

Authors:  D Gould; D Kelly; L Goldstone; J Gammon
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Motives for surgical-orthodontic treatment and effect of treatment on psychosocial well-being and satisfaction: a prospective study of 118 patients.

Authors:  Jesper Oland; John Jensen; Ask Elklit; Birte Melsen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community.

Authors:  K K Lew
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 9.  Oral health, health, and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  H C Gift; K A Atchison
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome.

Authors:  P M Finlay; J M Atkinson; K F Moos
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.