Literature DB >> 33282130

Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.

Michele Cassetta1, Rosanna Guarnieri2, Martina Mezio3, Federica Altieri4, Giulia Brandetti5, Gabriella Padalino4, Roberto Di Giorgio6, Ersilia Barbato7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patient's needs should guide the orthodontist in choosing the most appropriate therapy. The purpose of the present survey was to compare the esthetic perception of the facial profile by orthodontists (O), dentistry students (DS), orthodontic patients (OP) and surgical-orthodontic patients (SOP) and to evaluate the influence of gender, age and level of study.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A facial profile photograph of a young female was taken and twelve modified images were made, altering the position of the jaws in protrusion and in retrusion. Two hundred caucasian examiners, divided into four groups (O, DS, OP, SOP), were selected. Each examiner was asked to complete the questionnaire with an approval rating from 1 to 10. An ordinary least square OLS model was applied. Significant levels were set at P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: All examiners considered a straight profile or a slight retrusion of the maxilla as the most attractive profile. Slight discrepancies (up to 2 mm) in jaw protrusion were barely perceived by patients. Mandibular retrusion (2 and 4 mm) was one of the least appreciated condition by all examiners. Surgical-orthodontic patients assigned lower ratings compared to orthodontic patients. Female subjects assigned lower ratings than males. Patients with secondary school education assigned higher statistically significant values compared to other levels of study. The lowest values were attributed by the sample of age > = 17 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of the most appropriate therapy is based not only on a correct diagnosis, but on the evaluation of esthetic and psychological aspects. Key words:Estethic, profile, orthodontic, surgical orthodontic patients. Copyright:
© 2020 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33282130      PMCID: PMC7700782          DOI: 10.4317/jced.57593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  22 in total

1.  Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics.

Authors:  V O Kokich; H A Kiyak; P A Shapiro
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1999

2.  The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public.

Authors:  D Hall; R W Taylor; A Jacobson; P L Sadowsky; A Bartolucci
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.

Authors:  S M Cochrane; S J Cunningham; N P Hunt
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1999

4.  The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  C Phillips; C J Trentini; N Douvartzidis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  I Am Seen, Therefore I Am: Considerations on the Selfie Generation.

Authors:  Sara Gioia; Mariano Cingolani
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.921

7.  Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Mingchun Jiang; Wenjing Chen; Roger J Smales; Qingzhu Wang; Lei Tang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.

Authors:  S T Czarnecki; R S Nanda; G F Currier
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.

Authors:  G Michiels; A H Sather
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1994

10.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.

Authors:  Vincent O Kokich; Vincent G Kokich; H Asuman Kiyak
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gabriella Galluccio; Rosanna Guarnieri; Diana Jamshir; Alessandra Impellizzeri; Gaetano Ierardo; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.