Literature DB >> 21047853

Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups.

Christophe A H Bousquet1, David J T Sumpter, Marta B Manser.   

Abstract

Members of social groups need to coordinate their behaviour when choosing between alternative activities. Consensus decisions enable group members to maintain group cohesion and one way to reach consensus is to rely on quorums. A quorum response is where the probability of an activity change sharply increases with the number of individuals supporting the new activity. Here, we investigated how meerkats (Suricata suricatta) use vocalizations in the context of movement decisions. Moving calls emitted by meerkats increased the speed of the group, with a sharp increase in the probability of changing foraging patch when the number of group members joining the chorus increased from two up to three. These calls had no apparent effect on the group's movement direction. When dominant individuals were involved in the chorus, the group's reaction was not stronger than when only subordinates called. Groups only increased speed in response to playbacks of moving calls from one individual when other group members emitted moving calls as well. The voting mechanism linked to a quorum probably allows meerkat groups to change foraging patches cohesively with increased speed. Such vocal coordination may reflect an aggregation rule linking individual assessment of foraging patch quality to group travel route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047853      PMCID: PMC3081741          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.

Authors:  Sean A Rands; Guy Cowlishaw; Richard A Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Group performance and decision making.

Authors:  Norbert L Kerr; R Scott Tindale
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria.

Authors:  Christopher M Waters; Bonnie L Bassler
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 13.827

4.  Endogenous timing in competitive interactions among relatives.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement.

Authors:  E A Codling; J W Pitchford; S D Simpson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; S J Hodge; G Spong; A F Russell; N R Jordan; N C Bennett; L L Sharpe; M B Manser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta).

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; D Gaynor; R Kansky; A D MacColl; G McIlrath; P Chadwick; P N Brotherton; J M O'Riain; M Manser; J D Skinner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques?

Authors:  C Sueur; O Petit
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  The mechanism of flight guidance in honeybee swarms: subtle guides or streaker bees?

Authors:  Kevin M Schultz; Kevin M Passino; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ.

Authors:  Sean A Rands; Guy Cowlishaw; Richard A Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ants work harder during consensus decision-making in small groups.

Authors:  Adam L Cronin; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Lacey F Hughey; Andrew M Hein; Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Frants H Jensen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Inferring influence and leadership in moving animal groups.

Authors:  Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Danai Papageorgiou; Margaret C Crofoot; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions.

Authors:  Reena H Walker; Andrew J King; J Weldon McNutt; Neil R Jordan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Social monitoring via close calls in meerkats.

Authors:  Stephan A Reber; Simon W Townsend; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Calling rhythm as a predictor of the outcome of vocal interactions: flight departure in pale-winged starling pairs.

Authors:  Martine Hausberger; Aline Giacalone; Mariane Harmand; Adrian J F K Craig; Laurence Henry
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2019-12-03

7.  A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species.

Authors:  Sara Arganda; Alfonso Pérez-Escudero; Gonzalo G de Polavieja
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching.

Authors:  Alfonso Pérez-Escudero; Gonzalo G de Polavieja
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Segmental concatenation of individual signatures and context cues in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) close calls.

Authors:  David A W A M Jansen; Michael A Cant; Marta B Manser
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Determinants and outcomes of decision-making, group coordination and social interactions during a foraging experiment in a wild primate.

Authors:  Lennart W Pyritz; Claudia Fichtel; Elise Huchard; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.