Literature DB >> 14744229

Group performance and decision making.

Norbert L Kerr1, R Scott Tindale.   

Abstract

Theory and research on small group performance and decision making is reviewed. Recent trends in group performance research have found that process gains as well as losses are possible, and both are frequently explained by situational and procedural contexts that differentially affect motivation and resource coordination. Research has continued on classic topics (e.g., brainstorming, group goal setting, stress, and group performance) and relatively new areas (e.g., collective induction). Group decision making research has focused on preference combination for continuous response distributions and group information processing. New approaches (e.g., group-level signal detection) and traditional topics (e.g., groupthink) are discussed. New directions, such as nonlinear dynamic systems, evolutionary adaptation, and technological advances, should keep small group research vigorous well into the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14744229     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  69 in total

1.  Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild.

Authors:  Julie Morand-Ferron; John L Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sports teams as superorganisms: implications of sociobiological models of behaviour for research and practice in team sports performance analysis.

Authors:  Ricardo Duarte; Duarte Araújo; Vanda Correia; Keith Davids
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Community and team member factors that influence the operations phase of local prevention teams: the PROSPER Project.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Sarah M Chilenski; Mark T Greenberg; Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2007-06-30

4.  Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy.

Authors:  Takao Sasaki; Boris Granovskiy; Richard P Mann; David J T Sumpter; Stephen C Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A dynamical approach toward understanding mechanisms of team science: change, kinship, tension, and heritage in a transdisciplinary team.

Authors:  Gaetano R Lotrecchiano
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups.

Authors:  Christophe A H Bousquet; David J T Sumpter; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

8.  Collaborative Problem Solving in an Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Game.

Authors:  Aaron Bauer; Zoran Popović
Journal:  Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2017-11

Review 9.  Ensuring Resident Competence: A Narrative Review of the Literature on Group Decision Making to Inform the Work of Clinical Competency Committees.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Olle Ten Cate; Christy K Boscardin; William Iobst; Eric S Holmboe; Benjamin Chesluk; Robert B Baron; Patricia S O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

10.  Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Stefan M Herzog; Ralph Hertwig; Jens Krause; Patricia A Carney; Andy Bogart; Giuseppe Argenziano; Iris Zalaudek; Max Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.