Literature DB >> 17183322

Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals.

T H Clutton-Brock1, S J Hodge, G Spong, A F Russell, N R Jordan, N C Bennett, L L Sharpe, M B Manser.   

Abstract

In most animals, the sex that invests least in its offspring competes more intensely for access to the opposite sex and shows greater development of secondary sexual characters than the sex that invests most. However, in some mammals where females are the primary care-givers, females compete more frequently or intensely with each other than males. A possible explanation is that, in these species, the resources necessary for successful female reproduction are heavily concentrated and intrasexual competition for breeding opportunities is more intense among females than among males. Intrasexual competition between females is likely to be particularly intense in cooperative breeders where a single female monopolizes reproduction in each group. Here, we use data from a twelve-year study of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta), where females show high levels of reproductive skew, to show that females gain greater benefits from acquiring dominant status than males and traits that increase competitive ability exert a stronger influence on their breeding success. Females that acquire dominant status also develop a suite of morphological, physiological and behavioural characteristics that help them to control other group members. Our results show that sex differences in parental investment are not the only mechanism capable of generating sex differences in reproductive competition and emphasize the extent to which competition for breeding opportunities between females can affect the evolution of sex differences and the operation of sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17183322     DOI: 10.1038/nature05386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  66 in total

1.  Big and mighty: preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance.

Authors:  Lotte Thomsen; Willem E Frankenhuis; McCaila Ingold-Smith; Susan Carey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?

Authors:  Kimberly A Rosvall
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Family feuds: social competition and sexual conflict in complex societies.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Individual optimization efforts and population dynamics: a mathematical model for the evolution of resource allocation strategies, with applications to reproductive and mating systems.

Authors:  Jürgen Jost; John Pepper
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish.

Authors:  J L Fitzpatrick; J K Desjardins; N Milligan; K A Stiver; R Montgomerie; S Balshine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans.

Authors:  Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups.

Authors:  Christophe A H Bousquet; David J T Sumpter; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The number of subordinates moderates intrasexual competition among males in cooperatively breeding meerkats.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kutsukake; Tim H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.