Literature DB >> 1961774

The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem.

M R Dawson1.   

Abstract

A model that is capable of maintaining the identities of individuated elements as they move is described. It solves a particular problem of underdetermination, the motion correspondence problem, by simultaneously applying 3 constraints: the nearest neighbor principle, the relative velocity principle, and the element integrity principle. The model generates the same correspondence solutions as does the human visual system for a variety of displays, and many of its properties are consistent with what is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying human motion perception. The model can also be viewed as a proposal of how the identities of attentional tags are maintained by visual cognition, and thus it can be differentiated from a system that serves merely to detect movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1961774     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  24 in total

1.  Cue combination in the motion correspondence problem.

Authors:  P B Hibbard; M F Bradshaw; R A Eagle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The roles of the convex hull and the number of potential intersections in performance on visually presented traveling salesperson problems.

Authors:  Douglas Vickers; Michael D Lee; Matthew Dry; Peter Hughes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

3.  Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Teresa Stephens; Elisabeth Hein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

5.  Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

7.  Correspondence noise and signal pooling in the detection of coherent visual motion.

Authors:  H Barlow; S P Tripathy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.

Authors:  Johannes Bill; Hrag Pailian; Samuel J Gershman; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Richard; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.