Literature DB >> 21044605

TASSER_WT: a protein structure prediction algorithm with accurate predicted contact restraints for difficult protein targets.

Seung Yup Lee1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

To improve the prediction accuracy in the regime where template alignment quality is poor, an updated version of TASSER_2.0, namely TASSER_WT, was developed. TASSER_WT incorporates more accurate contact restraints from a new method, COMBCON. COMBCON uses confidence-weighted contacts from PROSPECTOR_3.5, the latest version, PROSPECTOR_4, and a new local structural fragment-based threading algorithm, STITCH, implemented in two variants depending on expected fragment prediction accuracy. TASSER_WT is tested on 622 Hard proteins, the most difficult targets (incorrect alignments and/or templates and incorrect side-chain contact restraints) in a comprehensive benchmark of 2591 nonhomologous, single domain proteins ≤ 200 residues that cover the PDB at 35% pairwise sequence identity. For 454 of 622 Hard targets, COMBCON provides contact restraints with higher accuracy and number of contacts per residue. As contact coverage with confidence weight ≥ 3 (F(wt ≥ 3)(cov)) increases, the more improved are TASSER_WT models. When F(wt ≥ 3)(cov) > 1.0 and > 0.4, the average root mean-square deviation of TASSER_WT (TASSER_2.0) models is 4.11 Å (6.72 Å) and 5.03 Å (6.40 Å), respectively. Regarding a structure prediction as successful when a model has a TM-score to the native structure ≥ 0.4, when F(wt ≥ 3)(cov) > 1.0 and > 0.4, the success rate of TASSER_WT (TASSER_2.0) is 98.8% (76.2%) and 93.7% (81.1%), respectively.
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044605      PMCID: PMC2966002          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  39 in total

1.  Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR--a new approach to threading.

Authors:  J Skolnick; D Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-02-15

2.  Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity.

Authors:  J Skolnick; A Kolinski; A Ortiz
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-01-01

3.  Progress in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  A G Murzin
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-02

4.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  J Pillardy; C Czaplewski; A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; R Kaźmierkiewicz; S Oldziej; W J Wedemeyer; K D Gibson; Y A Arnautova; J Saunders; Y J Ye; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fold recognition and accurate query-template alignment by a combination of PSI-BLAST and threading.

Authors:  Y Shan; G Wang; H X Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-01-01

Review 7.  Ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Corey Hardin; Taras V Pogorelov; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

9.  SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  A probabilistic and continuous model of protein conformational space for template-free modeling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.479

View more
  6 in total

1.  Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Probabilistic grammatical model for helix-helix contact site classification.

Authors:  Witold Dyrka; Jean-Christophe Nebel; Malgorzata Kotulska
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Protein Homology Detection Propelled by Inter-Residue Interaction Map Threading.

Authors:  Sutanu Bhattacharya; Rahmatullah Roche; Md Hossain Shuvo; Debswapna Bhattacharya
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.