Literature DB >> 21030142

A tissue phantom for visualization and measurement of ultrasound-induced cavitation damage.

Adam D Maxwell1, Tzu-Yin Wang, Lingqian Yuan, Alexander P Duryea, Zhen Xu, Charles A Cain.   

Abstract

Many ultrasound studies involve the use of tissue-mimicking materials to research phenomena in vitro and predict in vivo bioeffects. We have developed a tissue phantom to study cavitation-induced damage to tissue. The phantom consists of red blood cells suspended in an agarose hydrogel. The acoustic and mechanical properties of the gel phantom were found to be similar to soft tissue properties. The phantom's response to cavitation was evaluated using histotripsy. Histotripsy causes breakdown of tissue structures by the generation of controlled cavitation using short, focused, high-intensity ultrasound pulses. Histotripsy lesions were generated in the phantom and kidney tissue using a spherically focused 1-MHz transducer generating 15 cycle pulses, at a pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz with a peak negative pressure of 14 MPa. Damage appeared clearly as increased optical transparency of the phantom due to rupture of individual red blood cells. The morphology of lesions generated in the phantom was very similar to that generated in kidney tissue at both macroscopic and cellular levels. Additionally, lesions in the phantom could be visualized as hypoechoic regions on a B-mode ultrasound image, similar to histotripsy lesions in tissue. High-speed imaging of the optically transparent phantom was used to show that damage coincides with the presence of cavitation. These results indicate that the phantom can accurately mimic the response of soft tissue to cavitation and provide a useful tool for studying damage induced by acoustic cavitation.
Copyright © 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030142      PMCID: PMC2997329          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  35 in total

1.  Cell disruption by ultrasound.

Authors:  D E HUGHES; W L NYBORG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry.

Authors:  Cyril Lafon; Vesna Zderic; Misty L Noble; Jonathan C Yuen; Peter J Kaczkowski; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Francoise Chavrier; Lawrence A Crum; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; J Brian Fowlkes; Edward D Rothman; Albert M Levin; Charles A Cain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Direct thermal dose control of constrained focused ultrasound treatments: phantom and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Dhiraj Arora; Daniel Cooley; Trent Perry; Mikhail Skliar; Robert B Roemer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Investigation of intensity thresholds for ultrasound tissue erosion.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; J Brian Fowlkes; Achi Ludomirsky; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Cavitation-enhanced ultrasound thermal therapy by combined low- and high-frequency ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Hao-Li Liu; Wen-Shiang Chen; Jhao-Syong Chen; Tzu-Ching Shih; Yung-Yaw Chen; Win-Li Lin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue.

Authors:  Xinmai Yang; Charles C Church
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An anthropomorphic tissue-mimicking phantom of the oesophagus for endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Inglis; Kumar V Ramnarine; John N Plevris; W Norman McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound scattering from blood with hematocrits up to 100%.

Authors:  L Y Mo; I Y Kuo; K K Shung; L Ceresne; R S Cobbold
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Diffraction correction methods for insertion ultrasound attenuation estimation.

Authors:  W Xu; J J Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  44 in total

1.  An efficient treatment strategy for histotripsy by removing cavitation memory.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Wang; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Coagulation and ablation patterns of high-intensity focused ultrasound on a tissue-mimicking phantom and cadaveric skin.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kim; Han Gu Kim; Zhenlong Zheng; Hyoun Jun Park; Jeung Hyun Yoon; Wook Oh; Cheol Woo Lee; Sung Bin Cho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effect of Frequency and Focal Spacing on Transcranial Histotripsy Clot Liquefaction, Using Electronic Focal Steering.

Authors:  Tyler Gerhardson; Jonathan R Sukovich; Aditya S Pandey; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Effect of Frequency-Dependent Attenuation on Predicted Histotripsy Waveforms in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Michael J Crowe; Jason L Raymond; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Enhanced Shock Scattering Histotripsy With Pseudomonopolar Ultrasound Pulses.

Authors:  Yige Li; Timothy L Hall; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Deformable and conformal silk hydrogel inverse opal.

Authors:  Kyungtaek Min; Sookyoung Kim; Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dependence of inertial cavitation induced by high intensity focused ultrasound on transducer F-number and nonlinear waveform distortion.

Authors:  Tatiana Khokhlova; Pavel Rosnitskiy; Christopher Hunter; Adam Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Gail Ter Haar; Marcia Costa; Oleg Sapozhnikov; Vera Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The influence of gas diffusion on bubble persistence in shock-scattering histotripsy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Viktor Bollen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  The influence of medium elasticity on the prediction of histotripsy-induced bubble expansion and erythrocyte viability.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.