Literature DB >> 10823126

Immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlation of standards achieved on in house tumours with that achieved on external quality assessment material in over 150 laboratories from 26 countries.

A Rhodes1, B Jasani, A J Balaton, K D Miller.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the sensitivity of immunohistochemical (IHC) assays for oestrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) achieved by laboratories on breast tumours fixed and processed in their own department, and to compare this with the degree of sensitivity they achieve on tumours circulated as part of an external quality assessment (EQA) programme.
METHODS: On 10 occasions between April 1994 and June 1998, histological sections from breast cancers showing various degrees of expression of ER and PR were circulated for IHC staining to laboratories participating in the UK national external quality assessment scheme for immunocytochemistry (UK NEQAS-ICC). The staining of these tumours, in addition to that of tumours fixed and processed in the participants own laboratories (in house tumours), was assessed by a panel of four assessors, using the established UK NEQAS-ICC scoring system. For a selected assessment run, the degree of expression of participants in house tumours was evaluated by means of the semiquantitative quick score method.
RESULTS: Although the scores awarded for the staining of in house tumours were generally higher than those awarded for the staining of UK NEQAS tumours, there was also a significant positive correlation between the two sets of scores. Using the quick score method of evaluation for one of the assessment runs, 47% of in house tumours were classified as having a high degree of ER expression. Of the remaining cases, a significant proportion initially classified as having only low or medium expression of ER were found to have higher expression when stained by the organising laboratory. The UK NEQAS-ICC centre's routine assay for hormonal receptors was found to be 90-100% efficient in achieving optimal demonstration of breast tumours from over 150 different laboratories.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant positive correlation between the results obtained on the UK NEQAS tumours and the in house tumours provides evidence for the view that results achieved on EQA material are accurate indicators of in house laboratory performance. Although most laboratories adequately detected tumours with high receptor expression, a large proportion of in house tumours classified initially by participants' staining as being of low or medium ER expression had a higher degree of expression when stained by the UK NEQAS-ICC centre. The efficiency of the organising centre's routine IHC method for ER and PR in optimally demonstrating participants in house breast tumours shows that variations in fixation and tissue preparation are not limiting factors preventing a different laboratory achieving optimal demonstration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10823126      PMCID: PMC1731173          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.53.4.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  25 in total

Review 1.  Statistical power in the detection of matrix effects.

Authors:  T Long
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Possible role of tissue-bound calcium ions in citrate-mediated high-temperature antigen retrieval.

Authors:  J M Morgan; H Navabi; K W Schmid; B Jasani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen and progesterone receptor and prognosis in human primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Reiner; B Neumeister; J Spona; G Reiner; M Schemper; R Jakesz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen receptor in human breast tissue.

Authors:  K J Walker; N Bouzubar; J Robertson; I O Ellis; C W Elston; R W Blamey; D W Wilson; K Griffiths; R I Nicholson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; D M Barnes; L G Bobrow; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Production of monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen-receptor protein (ER) using recombinant ER (RER).

Authors:  T al Saati; S Clamens; E Cohen-Knafo; J C Faye; H Prats; J M Coindre; J Wafflart; P Caverivière; F Bayard; G Delsol
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-10-21       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Matrix effects and the accuracy of cholesterol analysis.

Authors:  J W Ross; G L Myers; B F Gilmore; G R Cooper; H R Naito; J Eckfeldt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Achieving accuracy for routine clinical chemistry methods by using patient specimen correlations to assign calibrator values. A means of managing matrix effects.

Authors:  F D Lasky
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system.

Authors:  H K Naito; Y S Kwak; J L Hartfiel; J K Park; E M Travers; G L Myers; J W Ross; J H Eckfeldt; A E Hartmann
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Comparison of two antibodies for evaluation of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded tumors.

Authors:  J B Hendricks; E J Wilkinson
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  34 in total

1.  Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system.

Authors:  S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Tissue microarrays: a new approach for quality control in immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  J Packeisen; H Buerger; R Krech; W Boecker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Glenn D Francis; Margaret Dimech; Leanne Giles; Alison Hopkins
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry: review and future prospects in research and diagnosis over two decades.

Authors:  Shan-Rong Shi; Yan Shi; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  The effect of freezing on the immunoprofile of breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Asuman Argon; Alper Şener; Osman Zekioğlu; Murat Kapkaç; Necmettin Özdemir
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Standardization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) measurement by quantitative immunofluorescence and impact on antibody-based mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Dimou; Seema Agarwal; Valsamo Anagnostou; Hollis Viray; Stephen Christensen; Bonnie Gould Rothberg; Vassiliki Zolota; Konstantinos Syrigos; David L Rimm
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Estrogen receptor β2 is inversely correlated with Ki-67 in hyperplastic and noninvasive neoplastic breast lesions.

Authors:  Nuiki Iota Chantzi; Marina Palaiologou; Artemis Stylianidou; Nikos Goutas; Stamatis Vassilaros; Helen P Kourea; Eugen Dhimolea; Dimitra J Mitsiou; Dina G Tiniakos; Muichael N Alexis
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Molecular preservation by extraction and fixation, mPREF: a method for small molecule biomarker analysis and histology on exactly the same tissue.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Shuster; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-12-21

10.  Molecular mechanisms of antigen retrieval: antigen retrieval reverses steric interference caused by formalin-induced cross-links.

Authors:  S A Bogen; K Vani; S R Sompuram
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.